Radeon HD 4850 X2
VS
Quadro K620M

Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs Quadro K620M

AMD

Radeon HD 4850 X2

2008Core: 625 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K620M

2015Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 4850 X2 is positioned at rank 291 and the Quadro K620M is on rank 101, so the Quadro K620M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4850 X2

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
2554%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2454%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
2425%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2421%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2416%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
2402%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
2372%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2363%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2342%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
2335%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
2307%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2302%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
2261%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2259%
#276
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
2817%
#291
Radeon HD 4850 X2
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
100%
#292
Radeon HD 4330
MSRP: $50|Avg: $9
95%
#293
GeForce GTX 260
MSRP: $449|Avg: $449
94%
#294
Radeon HD 8490
MSRP: $99|Avg: $35
94%
#295
Radeon HD 8650D
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
93%
#297
Radeon HDG 4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $15
89%
#298
Radeon HD 3870
MSRP: $219|Avg: $15
89%
#299
Radeon HD 4250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
87%
#300
Radeon HD 6310
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
86%
#301
GeForce GTX 295
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
85%
#302
Radeon HD 4870 X2
MSRP: $550|Avg: $550
84%
#303
Radeon HD 3850 X2
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
83%
#305
Radeon HD 4290
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
83%
#306
Radeon HD 5450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K620M

#52
RTX A1000
MSRP: $749|Avg: $500
100%
#54
Radeon Pro 5700
MSRP: $799|Avg: $250
99%
#55
Quadro P4000
MSRP: $815|Avg: $290
97%
#57
Quadro RTX 3000
MSRP: $800|Avg: $891
94%
#58
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700
92%
#59
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
88%
#60
Radeon Pro WX 8200
MSRP: $999|Avg: $350
87%
#86
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1020%
#101
Quadro K620M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#105
Quadro T2000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
96%
#111
Quadro P520
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
94%
#113
Radeon Pro WX 3100
MSRP: $199|Avg: $65
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro K620M is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The Quadro K620M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 4850 X2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro K620M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 4850 X2.

InsightRadeon HD 4850 X2Quadro K620M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)
Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K620M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4850 X2 and Quadro K620M

AMD

Radeon HD 4850 X2

The Radeon HD 4850 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 7 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,132 points. Launch price was $420.

NVIDIA

Quadro K620M

The Quadro K620M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,159 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 4850 X2 scores 1,132 and the Quadro K620M reaches 1,159 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4850 X2 is built on TeraScale while the Quadro K620M uses Maxwell, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4850 X2) vs 384 (Quadro K620M). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 4850 X2) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620M).

FeatureRadeon HD 4850 X2Quadro K620M
G3D Mark Score
1,132
1,159+2%
Architecture
TeraScale
Maxwell
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
800 ×2+108%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1 TFLOPS ×2+16%
0.8632 TFLOPS
ROPs
16 ×2+100%
8
TMUs
40 ×2+150%
16
L1 Cache
160 KB+25%
128 KB
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 4850 X2Quadro K620M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 4850 X2 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K620M has 4 GB. The Quadro K620M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4850 X2) vs 1 MB (Quadro K620M) — the Quadro K620M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 4850 X2Quadro K620M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
4 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 4850 X2 draws 250W versus the Quadro K620M's 30W — a 157.1% difference. The Quadro K620M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 4850 X2) vs 350W (Quadro K620M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 4850 X2Quadro K620M
TDP
250W
30W-88%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
95
Perf/Watt
4.5
38.6+758%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro K620M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).

FeatureRadeon HD 4850 X2Quadro K620M
MSRP
$399
Avg Price (30d)
$40
Codename
R700
GM108
Release
November 7 2008
March 1 2015
Ranking
#848
#842