Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs Radeon 610M
Radeon HD 4850 X2
Popular choices:
Radeon 610M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 4850 X2 is positioned at rank 291 and the Radeon 610M is on rank 346, so the Radeon HD 4850 X2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4850 X2
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 610M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 610M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2008). The Radeon 610M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 4850 X2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 610M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 4850 X2 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 610M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4850 X2 and Radeon 610M
Radeon HD 4850 X2
The Radeon HD 4850 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 7 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,132 points. Launch price was $420.
Radeon 610M
The Radeon 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,157 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 4850 X2 scores 1,132 and the Radeon 610M reaches 1,157 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4850 X2 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon 610M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4850 X2) vs 128 (Radeon 610M). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 4850 X2) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon 610M).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,132 | 1,157+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 ×2+525% | 128 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1 TFLOPS ×2+78% | 0.5632 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 ×2+300% | 4 |
| TMUs | 40 ×2+400% | 8 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+400% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 4850 X2 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 610M has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 4850 X2 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4850 X2) vs 2 MB (Radeon 610M) — the Radeon 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 4850 X2) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 610M). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12 (12_2)+19% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 4850 X2) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 610M). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Radeon HD 4850 X2) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 610M).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4850 X2 draws 250W versus the Radeon 610M's 15W — a 177.4% difference. The Radeon 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 4850 X2) vs 350W (Radeon 610M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 15W-94% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 95 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.5 | 77.1+1613% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 610M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | — |
| Codename | R700 | Dragon Range |
| Release | November 7 2008 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #848 | #843 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 4850 X2 and Radeon 610M
