Radeon HD 4870 X2
VS
Tesla M2070-Q

Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Tesla M2070-Q

AMD

Radeon HD 4870 X2

2008Core: 700 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla M2070-Q

2011Core: 574 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 4870 X2 is positioned at rank 302 and the Tesla M2070-Q is on rank 398, so the Radeon HD 4870 X2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4870 X2

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
3048%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2928%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
2894%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2889%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2883%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
2867%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
2831%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2820%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2794%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
2787%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
2753%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2747%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
2697%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2696%
#287
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
3361%
#302
Radeon HD 4870 X2
MSRP: $550|Avg: $550
100%
#303
Radeon HD 3850 X2
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
99%
#304
Radeon HD 4290
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#306
Radeon HD 5450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
95%
#308
Radeon HD 4200
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
94%
#309
Radeon HD 3850
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
94%
#311
Radeon HD 4270
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
92%
#312
Radeon E6460
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
91%
#313
Radeon HD 6290
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
88%
#314
GeForce GTX 280
MSRP: $649|Avg: $649
83%
#315
Radeon HD 3470
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
82%
#316
Radeon HD 3000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
81%
#317
Radeon HD 6250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
79%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla M2070-Q

#381
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
61554%
#396
Quadro FX 1500
MSRP: $699|Avg: $30
100%
#397
Quadro 7000
MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300
100%
#398
Tesla M2070-Q
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50
100%
#399
Quadro FX 3700
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500
96%
#400
Quadro FX 4700 X2
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15
96%
#401
GRID M10-0B
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000
92%
#402
GRID K340
MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57
83%
#404
Quadro FX 4600
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50
83%
#405
Quadro FX 5600
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50
75%
#407
Quadro FX 3500
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
71%
#408
Quadro FX 1400
MSRP: $799|Avg: $30
67%
#409
GRID K1
MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120
67%
#411
GRID P4-1Q
MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185
50%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 4870 X2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M2070-Q.

InsightRadeon HD 4870 X2Tesla M2070-Q
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Tesla M2070-Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla M2070-Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $550), it costs 91% less, resulting in a 997.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 4870 X2Tesla M2070-Q
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+997.5%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4870 X2 and Tesla M2070-Q

AMD

Radeon HD 4870 X2

The Radeon HD 4870 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 286W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,309 points. Launch price was $550.

NVIDIA

Tesla M2070-Q

The Tesla M2070-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,306 points. Launch price was $5,489.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 4870 X2 scores 1,309 and the Tesla M2070-Q reaches 1,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4870 X2 is built on TeraScale while the Tesla M2070-Q uses Fermi, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4870 X2) vs 448 (Tesla M2070-Q). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 4870 X2) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla M2070-Q).

FeatureRadeon HD 4870 X2Tesla M2070-Q
G3D Mark Score
1,309
1,306
Architecture
TeraScale
Fermi
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
800 ×2+79%
448
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS ×2+9%
1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs
16 ×2
48+200%
TMUs
40 ×2
56+40%
L1 Cache
160 KB
896 KB+460%
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 4870 X2Tesla M2070-Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 4870 X2 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2070-Q has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 4870 X2 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 4870 X2) vs 768 KB (Tesla M2070-Q) — the Tesla M2070-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 4870 X2Tesla M2070-Q
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 4870 X2 draws 286W versus the Tesla M2070-Q's 225W — a 23.9% difference. The Tesla M2070-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon HD 4870 X2) vs 350W (Tesla M2070-Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 4870 X2Tesla M2070-Q
TDP
286W
225W-21%
Recommended PSU
650W
350W-46%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
4.6
5.8+26%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 4870 X2 launched at $550 MSRP and currently averages $550, while the Tesla M2070-Q launched at $5489 and now averages $50. The Tesla M2070-Q costs 90.9% less ($500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.4 (Radeon HD 4870 X2) vs 26.1 (Tesla M2070-Q) — the Tesla M2070-Q offers 987.5% better value. The Tesla M2070-Q is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).

FeatureRadeon HD 4870 X2Tesla M2070-Q
MSRP
$550-90%
$5489
Avg Price (30d)
$550
$50-91%
Performance per Dollar
2.4
26.1+988%
Codename
R700
GF100
Release
August 12 2008
July 25 2011
Ranking
#796
#798