
FireStream 9270

Radeon HD 4870 X2
FireStream 9270 vs Radeon HD 4870 X2 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FireStream 9270 vs Radeon HD 4870 X2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FireStream 9270 vs Radeon HD 4870 X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FireStream 9270
2008Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 286W, a 126W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌172.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$550 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $550 MSRP).
Radeon HD 4870 X2
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $949 less on MSRP ($550 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 166% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($550 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌78.8% higher power demand at 286W vs 160W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FireStream 9270 vs Radeon HD 4870 X2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FireStream 9270
The FireStream 9270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,341 points.

Radeon HD 4870 X2
The Radeon HD 4870 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 286W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,309 points. Launch price was $550.
Graphics Performance
The FireStream 9270 scores 1,341 and the Radeon HD 4870 X2 reaches 1,309 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9270 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon HD 4870 X2 uses TeraScale, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9270) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4870 X2). Raw compute: 1.2 TFLOPS (FireStream 9270) vs 1.12 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 4870 X2).
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,341+2% | 1,309 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 800 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.2 TFLOPS+7% | 1.12 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FireStream 9270 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4870 X2 carries 1 GB. FireStream 9270 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9270 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4870 X2.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FireStream 9270) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4870 X2). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9270) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4,DivX (Radeon HD 4870 X2).
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | — |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4,DivX |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9270 draws 160W versus the Radeon HD 4870 X2's 286W — a 56.5% difference. The FireStream 9270 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9270) vs 650W (Radeon HD 4870 X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-44% | 286W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C-6% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 8.4+83% | 4.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FireStream 9270 came in at $1499, while the Radeon HD 4870 X2 launched at $550. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4870 X2 was 63.3% cheaper ($949 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (FireStream 9270) vs 2.4 (Radeon HD 4870 X2) — the Radeon HD 4870 X2 offers 166.7% better value.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $550-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9 | 2.4+167% |
| Codename | RV770 | R700 |
| Release | November 13 2008 | August 12 2008 |
| Ranking | #790 | #796 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















