FireStream 9270 vs Quadro K2100M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FireStream 9270 vs Quadro K2100M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FireStream 9270 vs Quadro K2100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FireStream 9270

2008

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌190.9% higher power demand at 160W vs 55W.

Quadro K2100M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 55W instead of 160W, a 105W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K2100M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (1,370 vs 1,341), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FireStream 9270 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FireStream 9270 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro K2100M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FireStream 9270 vs Quadro K2100M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FireStream 9270

The FireStream 9270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,341 points.

Quadro K2100M

The Quadro K2100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,370 points. Launch price was $84.95.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FireStream 9270 scores 1,341 and the Quadro K2100M reaches 1,370 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9270 is built on TeraScale while the Quadro K2100M uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9270) vs 576 (Quadro K2100M). Raw compute: 1.2 TFLOPS (FireStream 9270) vs 0.7684 TFLOPS (Quadro K2100M).

Feature	FireStream 9270	Quadro K2100M
G3D Mark Score	1,341	1,370+2%
Architecture	TeraScale	Kepler
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	800+39%	576
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.2 TFLOPS+56%	0.7684 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	48+20%
L1 Cache	160 KB+233%	48 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FireStream 9270	Quadro K2100M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9270 and 64-bit on the Quadro K2100M.

Feature	FireStream 9270	Quadro K2100M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FireStream 9270) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2100M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

Feature	FireStream 9270	Quadro K2100M
DirectX	10.1	12 (11_0)+19%
OpenGL	3.3	4.6+39%
Max Displays	1	4+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9270) vs 1st Gen NVENC (Quadro K2100M). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9270) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K2100M).

Feature	FireStream 9270	Quadro K2100M
Encoder	None	1st Gen NVENC
Decoder	UVD 2.2	1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FireStream 9270 draws 160W versus the Quadro K2100M's 55W — a 97.7% difference. The Quadro K2100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9270) vs 350W (Quadro K2100M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

Feature	FireStream 9270	Quadro K2100M
TDP	160W	55W-66%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85°C	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	8.4	24.9+196%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K2100M (2013 vs 2008).

Feature	FireStream 9270	Quadro K2100M
MSRP	$1499	—
Codename	RV770	GK106
Release	November 13 2008	July 23 2013
Ranking	#790	#788

Search FireStream 9270 on Amazon

Search Quadro K2100M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.