
FireStream 9270
Popular choices:

Radeon Vega 6
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FireStream 9270 is positioned at rank #359 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FireStream 9270
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Vega 6 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2008). The Radeon Vega 6 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FireStream 9270 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FireStream 9270 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Vega 6.
| Insight | FireStream 9270 | Radeon Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the FireStream 9270 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FireStream 9270 and Radeon Vega 6

FireStream 9270
The FireStream 9270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,341 points.

Radeon Vega 6
The Radeon Vega 6 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2021. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,309 points.
Graphics Performance
The FireStream 9270 scores 1,341 and the Radeon Vega 6 reaches 1,309 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9270 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon Vega 6 uses GCN 5.1, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9270) vs 448 (Radeon Vega 6). Raw compute: 1.2 TFLOPS (FireStream 9270) vs 1.702 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 6).
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Radeon Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,341+2% | 1,309 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+79% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.2 TFLOPS | 1.702 TFLOPS+42% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+43% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Radeon Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FireStream 9270 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 6 has 0 MB. The FireStream 9270 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Radeon Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9270 draws 160W versus the Radeon Vega 6's 45W — a 112.2% difference. The Radeon Vega 6 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9270) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 6). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Radeon Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 45W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 8.4 | 29.1+246% |
Value Analysis
The FireStream 9270 launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon Vega 6 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Vega 6 costs 100+% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 67.0 (FireStream 9270) vs Infinity (Radeon Vega 6) — the Radeon Vega 6 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Vega 6 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2008).
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Radeon Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | RV770 | Cezanne |
| Release | November 13 2008 | April 13 2021 |
| Ranking | #790 | #601 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















