FireStream 9270
Radeon Vega 6
FireStream 9270 vs Radeon Vega 6 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FireStream 9270 vs Radeon Vega 6 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FireStream 9270 vs Radeon Vega 6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FireStream 9270
2008Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌255.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 45W.
Radeon Vega 6
2021Why buy it
- ✅FireStream 9270 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Vega 6 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 160W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2021 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FireStream 9270 vs Radeon Vega 6 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FireStream 9270
The FireStream 9270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,341 points.
Radeon Vega 6
The Radeon Vega 6 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2021. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,309 points.
Graphics Performance
The FireStream 9270 scores 1,341 and the Radeon Vega 6 reaches 1,309 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9270 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon Vega 6 uses GCN 5.1, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9270) vs 448 (Radeon Vega 6). Raw compute: 1.2 TFLOPS (FireStream 9270) vs 1.702 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 6).
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Radeon Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,341+2% | 1,309 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+79% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.2 TFLOPS | 1.702 TFLOPS+42% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+43% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Radeon Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FireStream 9270 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 6 carries 0 MB. FireStream 9270 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9270 and System on the Radeon Vega 6.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Radeon Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9270 draws 160W versus the Radeon Vega 6's 45W — a 112.2% difference. The Radeon Vega 6 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9270) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 6). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Radeon Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 45W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 8.4 | 29.1+246% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FireStream 9270 came in at $1499, while the Radeon Vega 6 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Vega 6 was 100+% cheaper ($1499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (FireStream 9270) vs Infinity (Radeon Vega 6) — the Radeon Vega 6 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Vega 6 (2021 vs 2008).
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Radeon Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | RV770 | Cezanne |
| Release | November 13 2008 | April 13 2021 |
| Ranking | #790 | #601 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FireStream 9270 and Radeon Vega 6
