Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FireStream 9270 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FireStream 9270

2008Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 640

2017Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FireStream 9270 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640 Performance Spectrum

FireStream 9270
2 GB 160
1,341
0.0%
brand logoRadeon R7 A10-7800
brand logoRadeon Vega 3
brand logoRadeon HD 8570D + HD 8570 Dual
brand logoRadeon HD 7750M
brand logoRadeon RX 5500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 6700S
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Shared System RAM 15
1,353
+0.9%
brand logoArc Graphics 130T
brand logoArc A770M
brand logoArc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FireStream 9270 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FireStream 9270

2008

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • ✅Iris Plus Graphics 640 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FireStream 9270 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌966.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 15W.

Iris Plus Graphics 640

2017

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 15W instead of 160W, a 145W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (1,353 vs 1,341), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FireStream 9270 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FireStream 9270 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Iris Plus Graphics 640 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FireStream 9270 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FireStream 9270

The FireStream 9270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,341 points.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 640

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,353 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FireStream 9270 scores 1,341 and the Iris Plus Graphics 640 reaches 1,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9270 is built on TeraScale while the Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses Generation 9.5, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9270) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Raw compute: 1.2 TFLOPS (FireStream 9270) vs 0.8448 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 640).

FeatureFireStream 9270Iris Plus Graphics 640
G3D Mark Score
1,341
1,353
Architecture
TeraScale
Generation 9.5
Process Node
55 nm
14 nm++
Shading Units
800+108%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.2 TFLOPS+42%
0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+167%
6
TMUs
40
48+20%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFireStream 9270Iris Plus Graphics 640
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FireStream 9270 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 640 carries 0 MB. FireStream 9270 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9270 and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 640.

FeatureFireStream 9270Iris Plus Graphics 640
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FireStream 9270) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 640). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.

FeatureFireStream 9270Iris Plus Graphics 640
DirectX
10.1
12 (12_1)+19%
OpenGL
3.3
4.6+39%
Max Displays
1
3+200%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9270) vs Quick Sync Video (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs Quick Sync Video. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9270) vs H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 640).

FeatureFireStream 9270Iris Plus Graphics 640
Encoder
None
Quick Sync Video
Decoder
UVD 2.2
Quick Sync Video
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FireStream 9270 draws 160W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 640's 15W — a 165.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9270) vs 0W (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80.

FeatureFireStream 9270Iris Plus Graphics 640
TDP
160W
15W-91%
Recommended PSU
350W
0W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
241mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
80-6%
Perf/Watt
8.4
90.2+974%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FireStream 9270 came in at $1499, while the Iris Plus Graphics 640 launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics 640 was 100+% cheaper ($1499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (FireStream 9270) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 640) — the Iris Plus Graphics 640 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics 640 (2017 vs 2008).

FeatureFireStream 9270Iris Plus Graphics 640
MSRP
$1499
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.9
Infinity
Codename
RV770
Kaby Lake GT3e
Release
November 13 2008
January 3 2017
Ranking
#790
#767
Search FireStream 9270 on AmazonSearch Iris Plus Graphics 640 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.