FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FireStream 9270

2008

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 460M SLI

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
✅More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 460M SLI is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.9% in PassMark G3D (1,393 vs 1,341), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FireStream 9270 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FireStream 9270 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 460M SLI still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FireStream 9270

The FireStream 9270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,341 points.

GeForce GTX 460M SLI

The GeForce GTX 460M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 3 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,393 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FireStream 9270 scores 1,341 and the GeForce GTX 460M SLI reaches 1,393 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9270 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce GTX 460M SLI uses Fermi, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9270) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 460M SLI).

Feature	FireStream 9270	GeForce GTX 460M SLI
G3D Mark Score	1,341	1,393+4%
Architecture	TeraScale	Fermi
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	800+108%	384

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 460M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FireStream 9270 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	FireStream 9270	GeForce GTX 460M SLI
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FireStream 9270 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460M SLI carries 512 MB. FireStream 9270 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9270 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460M SLI.

Feature	FireStream 9270	GeForce GTX 460M SLI
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FireStream 9270) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460M SLI). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	FireStream 9270	GeForce GTX 460M SLI
DirectX	10.1	12 (11_0)+19%
OpenGL	3.3	4.6+39%
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9270) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460M SLI). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9270) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460M SLI).

Feature	FireStream 9270	GeForce GTX 460M SLI
Encoder	None	PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder	UVD 2.2	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FireStream 9270 draws 160W versus the GeForce GTX 460M SLI's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 460M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9270) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 460M SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

Feature	FireStream 9270	GeForce GTX 460M SLI
TDP	160W	75W-53%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	241mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85°C	85°C
Perf/Watt	8.4	18.6+121%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 460M SLI (2010 vs 2008).

Feature	FireStream 9270	GeForce GTX 460M SLI
MSRP	$1499	—
Codename	RV770	N11E-GS
Release	November 13 2008	September 3 2010
Ranking	#790	#696

Search FireStream 9270 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 460M SLI on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.