FireStream 9270 vs Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

FireStream 9270

2008Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FireStream 9270 vs Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FireStream 9270 vs Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FireStream 9270

2008

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FireStream 9270 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 966.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 15W.

Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 160W, a 145W reduction.
  • More future proof: Vega (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (1,348 vs 1,341), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FireStream 9270 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FireStream 9270 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FireStream 9270 vs Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FireStream 9270

The FireStream 9270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,341 points.

AMD

Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

The Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2018. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,348 points.

Graphics Performance

The FireStream 9270 scores 1,341 and the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U reaches 1,348 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9270 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U uses Vega, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9270) vs 384 (Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U). Raw compute: 1.2 TFLOPS (FireStream 9270) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U).

FeatureFireStream 9270Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
G3D Mark Score
1,341
1,348
Architecture
TeraScale
Vega
Process Node
55 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
800+108%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.2 TFLOPS
1.306 TFLOPS+9%
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
40+67%
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFireStream 9270Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FireStream 9270 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U carries 0 MB. FireStream 9270 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9270 and System on the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U.

FeatureFireStream 9270Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FireStream 9270 draws 160W versus the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U's 15W — a 165.7% difference. The Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9270) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureFireStream 9270Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
TDP
160W
15W-91%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
241mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
8.4
89.9+970%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FireStream 9270 came in at $1499, while the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U was 100+% cheaper ($1499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (FireStream 9270) vs Infinity (Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U) — the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U (2018 vs 2008).

FeatureFireStream 9270Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
MSRP
$1499
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.9
Infinity
Codename
RV770
Vega Raven Ridge
Release
November 13 2008
January 7 2018
Ranking
#790
#831

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.