CPU
GPU
FireStream 9270
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 275
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FireStream 9270 is positioned at rank 359 and the GeForce GTX 275 is on rank 217, so the GeForce GTX 275 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FireStream 9270
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 275
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 275 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FireStream 9270 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+128.6%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FireStream 9270 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FireStream 9270 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $249), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1137.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1137.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($249) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 275
FireStream 9270
The FireStream 9270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,341 points.
GeForce GTX 275
The GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 15 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 633 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The FireStream 9270 scores 1,341 and the GeForce GTX 275 reaches 1,349 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9270 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce GTX 275 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9270) vs 240 (GeForce GTX 275). Raw compute: 1.2 TFLOPS (FireStream 9270) vs 0.6739 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 275).
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,341 | 1,349 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+233% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.2 TFLOPS+78% | 0.6739 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 28+75% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+14% | 224 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FireStream 9270 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 275 has 896 MB. The FireStream 9270 offers 128.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FireStream 9270) vs 224 KB (GeForce GTX 275) — the FireStream 9270 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+129% | 0.875 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+14% | 224 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FireStream 9270) vs 11 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 275). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11 (10_0)+9% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9270) vs No (GeForce GTX 275). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9270) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 275).
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9270 draws 160W versus the GeForce GTX 275's 219W — a 31.1% difference. The FireStream 9270 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9270) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 275). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-27% | 219W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 8.4+35% | 6.2 |
Value Analysis
The FireStream 9270 launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce GTX 275 launched at $249 and now averages $249. The FireStream 9270 costs 92% less ($229 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 67.0 (FireStream 9270) vs 5.4 (GeForce GTX 275) — the FireStream 9270 offers 1140.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 275 is the newer GPU (2009 vs 2008).
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $249-83% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-92% | $249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.0+1141% | 5.4 |
| Codename | RV770 | GT200B |
| Release | November 13 2008 | January 15 2009 |
| Ranking | #790 | #789 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 275
