Radeon HD 5850
VS
Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Radeon HD 5850 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics

AMD

Radeon HD 5850

2009Core: 725 MHz
VS
Intel

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

2020Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1650 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe MAX Graphics

#39
Radeon RX 7700S
MSRP: $449|Avg: $350
96%
#129
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
303%
#131
275%
#132
274%
#136
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
249%
#137
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
247%
#139
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
MSRP: $55|Avg: $40
100%
#145
Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
MSRP: $229|Avg: $65
97%
#147
GeForce GT 630M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $35
97%
#150
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is significantly newer (2020 vs 2009). The Iris Xe MAX Graphics likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 5850 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 5850 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon HD 5850Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (10nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 5850 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $40 for the Iris Xe MAX Graphics, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 32.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 5850Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+32.2%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($30)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 5850 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics

AMD

Radeon HD 5850

The Radeon HD 5850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 30 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1440 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 151W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,955 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 5850 scores 1,955 and the Iris Xe MAX Graphics reaches 1,972 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5850 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Iris Xe MAX Graphics uses Generation 12.1, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 1,440 (Radeon HD 5850) vs 768 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Raw compute: 2.088 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5850) vs 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe MAX Graphics).

FeatureRadeon HD 5850Iris Xe MAX Graphics
G3D Mark Score
1,955
1,972
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Generation 12.1
Process Node
40 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
1440+88%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.088 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS+21%
ROPs
32+33%
24
TMUs
72+50%
48
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 5850Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 5850 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe MAX Graphics has 0 MB. The Radeon HD 5850 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 5850) vs 1 MB (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) — the Iris Xe MAX Graphics has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 5850Iris Xe MAX Graphics
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
System
Bus Width
256-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon HD 5850) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics).

FeatureRadeon HD 5850Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Encoder
QuickSync
Decoder
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 5850 draws 151W versus the Iris Xe MAX Graphics's 25W — a 143.2% difference. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 5850) vs 1W (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated.

FeatureRadeon HD 5850Iris Xe MAX Graphics
TDP
151W
25W-83%
Recommended PSU
500W
1W-100%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
12.9
78.9+512%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 5850 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Iris Xe MAX Graphics launched at $55 and now averages $40. The Radeon HD 5850 costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.2 (Radeon HD 5850) vs 49.3 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) — the Radeon HD 5850 offers 32.3% better value. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2009).

FeatureRadeon HD 5850Iris Xe MAX Graphics
MSRP
$299
$55-82%
Avg Price (30d)
$30-25%
$40
Performance per Dollar
65.2+32%
49.3
Codename
Cypress
DG1
Release
September 30 2009
October 31 2020
Ranking
#682
#686