
Radeon HD 5850 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Radeon HD 5850
Popular choices:

Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is significantly newer (2020 vs 2009). The Iris Xe MAX Graphics likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 5850 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 5850 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 5850 | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 5850 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $40 for the Iris Xe MAX Graphics, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 32.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 5850 | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+32.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 5850 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Radeon HD 5850
The Radeon HD 5850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 30 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1440 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 151W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,955 points. Launch price was $299.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 5850 scores 1,955 and the Iris Xe MAX Graphics reaches 1,972 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5850 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Iris Xe MAX Graphics uses Generation 12.1, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 1,440 (Radeon HD 5850) vs 768 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Raw compute: 2.088 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5850) vs 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe MAX Graphics).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5850 | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,955 | 1,972 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Generation 12.1 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 1440+88% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.088 TFLOPS | 2.534 TFLOPS+21% |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 72+50% | 48 |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 5850 | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 5850 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe MAX Graphics has 0 MB. The Radeon HD 5850 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 5850) vs 1 MB (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) — the Iris Xe MAX Graphics has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5850 | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon HD 5850) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5850 | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | QuickSync |
| Decoder | — | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 5850 draws 151W versus the Iris Xe MAX Graphics's 25W — a 143.2% difference. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 5850) vs 1W (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5850 | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 151W | 25W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 12.9 | 78.9+512% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 5850 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Iris Xe MAX Graphics launched at $55 and now averages $40. The Radeon HD 5850 costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.2 (Radeon HD 5850) vs 49.3 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) — the Radeon HD 5850 offers 32.3% better value. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5850 | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $55-82% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-25% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.2+32% | 49.3 |
| Codename | Cypress | DG1 |
| Release | September 30 2009 | October 31 2020 |
| Ranking | #682 | #686 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















