Radeon HD 5850
VS
GeForce GTX 460 SE

Radeon HD 5850 vs GeForce GTX 460 SE

AMD

Radeon HD 5850

2009Core: 725 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 SE

2010Core: 650 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 460 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 5850 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon HD 5850GeForce GTX 460 SE
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 5850 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 5850 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 63.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 5850GeForce GTX 460 SE
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+63.9%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($30)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 5850 and GeForce GTX 460 SE

AMD

Radeon HD 5850

The Radeon HD 5850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 30 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1440 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 151W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,955 points. Launch price was $299.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 SE

The GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,988 points. Launch price was $160.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 5850 scores 1,955 and the GeForce GTX 460 SE reaches 1,988 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5850 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce GTX 460 SE uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,440 (Radeon HD 5850) vs 288 (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Raw compute: 2.088 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5850) vs 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 SE).

FeatureRadeon HD 5850GeForce GTX 460 SE
G3D Mark Score
1,955
1,988+2%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Fermi
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1440+400%
288
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.088 TFLOPS+179%
0.7488 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
72+50%
48
L1 Cache
144 KB
384 KB+167%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 5850GeForce GTX 460 SE
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 5850 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 SE has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 5850 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 5850GeForce GTX 460 SE
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+100%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon HD 5850) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 460 SE).

FeatureRadeon HD 5850GeForce GTX 460 SE
Encoder
UVD 4.0
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
Codecs
H.264
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 5850 draws 151W versus the GeForce GTX 460 SE's 150W — a 0.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 460 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 5850) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon HD 5850GeForce GTX 460 SE
TDP
151W
150W
Recommended PSU
500W
450W-10%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
2x 6-pin
Length
210mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
12.9
13.3+3%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 5850 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce GTX 460 SE launched at $160 and now averages $50. The Radeon HD 5850 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.2 (Radeon HD 5850) vs 39.8 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) — the Radeon HD 5850 offers 63.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 460 SE is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2009).

FeatureRadeon HD 5850GeForce GTX 460 SE
MSRP
$299
$160-46%
Avg Price (30d)
$30-40%
$50
Performance per Dollar
65.2+64%
39.8
Codename
Cypress
GF104
Release
September 30 2009
November 15 2010
Ranking
#682
#683