Radeon HD 6230 vs Radeon HDG 4670

AMD

Radeon HD 6230

2011Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HDG 4670

2010Boost: 880 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 6230 vs Radeon HDG 4670 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6230 vs Radeon HDG 4670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6230 vs Radeon HDG 4670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6230

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $17 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).
  • Delivers 41.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.6 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).
  • Draws 186W instead of 250W, a 64W reduction.
  • Measures 168mm instead of 193mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HDG 4670

2010

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 34% HIGHER MSRP
    $67 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($67 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 34.4% higher power demand at 250W vs 186W.
  • 14.9% longer card at 193mm vs 168mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6230 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5.3% in PassMark G3D (179 vs 170), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 6230 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2011 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6230 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $17 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $67, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 41.1% (3.6 vs 2.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon HD 6230 vs Radeon HDG 4670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 6230

The Radeon HD 6230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points. Launch price was $180.

AMD

Radeon HDG 4670

The Radeon HDG 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $369.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 6230 scores 179 versus the Radeon HDG 4670's 170 — the Radeon HD 6230 leads by 5.3%. The Radeon HD 6230 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon HDG 4670 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 6230) vs 1,536 (Radeon HDG 4670). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6230) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HDG 4670).

FeatureRadeon HD 6230Radeon HDG 4670
G3D Mark Score
179+5%
170
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TeraScale 3
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1280
1536+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.92 TFLOPS
2.703 TFLOPS+41%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
96+20%
L1 Cache
320 KB+67%
192 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6230Radeon HDG 4670
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6230 and 128-bit on the Radeon HDG 4670.

FeatureRadeon HD 6230Radeon HDG 4670
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 6230) vs 10.1 (Radeon HDG 4670). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon HD 6230Radeon HDG 4670
DirectX
11.2+11%
10.1
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2.2 (Radeon HD 6230) vs UVD 2 (Radeon HDG 4670). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 2.

FeatureRadeon HD 6230Radeon HDG 4670
Encoder
UVD 2.2
UVD 2
Decoder
UVD 2.2
UVD 2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6230 draws 186W versus the Radeon HDG 4670's 250W — a 29.4% difference. The Radeon HD 6230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6230) vs 350W (Radeon HDG 4670). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 193mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureRadeon HD 6230Radeon HDG 4670
TDP
186W-26%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
193mm
Slots
1
1
Perf/Watt
1.0+43%
0.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 6230 came in at $50, while the Radeon HDG 4670 launched at $67. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6230 was 25.4% cheaper ($17 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.6 (Radeon HD 6230) vs 2.5 (Radeon HDG 4670) — the Radeon HD 6230 offers 44% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 6230 (2011 vs 2010).

FeatureRadeon HD 6230Radeon HDG 4670
MSRP
$50-25%
$67
Performance per Dollar
3.6+44%
2.5
Codename
Cayman
Cayman
Release
December 1 2011
December 14 2010
Ranking
#598
#596

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.