Radeon HD 6300M
VS
GeForce Go 7700

Radeon HD 6300M vs GeForce Go 7700

AMD

Radeon HD 6300M

2011Core: 750 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7700

2013Core: 1046 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 6300M is positioned at rank #332 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6300M

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
7556%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
7259%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
7175%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
7163%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
7148%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
7107%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
7018%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
6992%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
6927%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
6908%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
6825%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
6810%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
6688%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
6683%
#317
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
8333%
#332
Radeon HD 6300M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#334
Radeon X1650 Pro
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
89%
#335
RADEON X550
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
89%
#337
Radeon HD 8350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $39
85%
#339
Radeon X1950 GT
MSRP: $140|Avg: $49
79%
#340
GeForce 6600 GT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $50
75%
#341
RADEON X600 PRO
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
71%
#342
Radeon X1600 Pro
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
69%
#343
RADEON X300SE
MSRP: $60|Avg: $60
66%
#345
RADEON X800 GTO
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
60%
#346
Radeon X1600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
60%
#347
Radeon X1300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $49
60%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce Go 7700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6300M.

InsightRadeon HD 6300MGeForce Go 7700
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%)
Leading raw performance (+2.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 7700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6300M and GeForce Go 7700

AMD

Radeon HD 6300M

The Radeon HD 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 144 points. Launch price was $180.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7700

The GeForce Go 7700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6300M scores 144 and the GeForce Go 7700 reaches 148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6300M is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce Go 7700 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 6300M) vs 1,536 (GeForce Go 7700). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6300M) vs 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7700).

FeatureRadeon HD 6300MGeForce Go 7700
G3D Mark Score
144
148+3%
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Kepler
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280
1536+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.92 TFLOPS
3.333 TFLOPS+74%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
128+60%
L1 Cache
320 KB+150%
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6300MGeForce Go 7700
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 6300MGeForce Go 7700
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6300M draws 186W versus the GeForce Go 7700's 230W — a 21.2% difference. The Radeon HD 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6300M) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7700). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy.

FeatureRadeon HD 6300MGeForce Go 7700
TDP
186W-19%
230W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Legacy
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
0.8+33%
0.6