Radeon HD 6300M vs Radeon R5 220

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6300M vs Radeon R5 220 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6300M vs Radeon R5 220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6300M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 186W instead of 275W, a 89W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $35 MSRP).

Radeon R5 220

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌47.8% higher power demand at 275W vs 186W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 220 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (147 vs 144), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 6300M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 220 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 220 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 6300M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 6300M vs Radeon R5 220 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 6300M

The Radeon HD 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 144 points. Launch price was $180.

Radeon R5 220

The Radeon R5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6300M scores 144 and the Radeon R5 220 reaches 147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6300M is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon R5 220 uses GCN 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 6300M) vs 2,560 (Radeon R5 220). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6300M) vs 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 220).

Feature	Radeon HD 6300M	Radeon R5 220
G3D Mark Score	144	147+2%
Architecture	TeraScale 3	GCN 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280	2560+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.92 TFLOPS	4.849 TFLOPS+153%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	80	160+100%
L1 Cache	320 KB	640 KB+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 6300M	Radeon R5 220
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6300M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 220 carries 1 GB. Radeon R5 220 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon HD 6300M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 220. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6300M) vs 1 MB (Radeon R5 220) — the Radeon R5 220 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 6300M	Radeon R5 220
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6300M draws 186W versus the Radeon R5 220's 275W — a 38.6% difference. The Radeon HD 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6300M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 220). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon HD 6300M	Radeon R5 220
TDP	186W-32%	275W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	0.8+60%	0.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R5 220 (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	Radeon HD 6300M	Radeon R5 220
MSRP	—	$35
Codename	Cayman	Hawaii
Release	December 1 2011	November 5 2013
Ranking	#598	#316

Search Radeon HD 6300M on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 220 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.