Quadro FX 380 LP vs Radeon HD 6300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 380 LP is positioned at rank 362 and the Radeon HD 6300M is on rank 332, so the Radeon HD 6300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 380 LP

#347

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

17178%

#362

Quadro FX 380 LP

MSRP: $169|Avg: $15

100%

#364

Quadro FX 1800

MSRP: $489|Avg: $100

94%

#365

FirePro 3D V8700

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229

93%

#366

FirePro 3D V9800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80

93%

#367

Quadro 5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100

92%

#368

FirePro V9800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250

91%

#369

FirePro V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $20

91%

#370

FirePro 3D V8750

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500

83%

#371

FirePro 3D V7750

MSRP: $799|Avg: $20

79%

#372

GRID M10-2B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80

77%

#373

Quadro FX 370

MSRP: $129|Avg: $500

76%

#374

RTXA5000-6Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500

71%

#375

Quadro 6000

MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150

71%

#376

GRID M6-0B

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

71%

#377

GRID M10-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150

70%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6300M

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

7556%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

7259%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

7175%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

7163%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

7148%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

7107%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

7018%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

6992%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

6927%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

6908%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

6825%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

6810%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

6688%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

6683%

#317

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

8333%

#332

Radeon HD 6300M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#334

Radeon X1650 Pro

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

89%

#335

RADEON X550

MSRP: $60|Avg: $10

89%

#337

Radeon HD 8350

MSRP: $200|Avg: $39

85%

#339

Radeon X1950 GT

MSRP: $140|Avg: $49

79%

#340

GeForce 6600 GT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $50

75%

#341

RADEON X600 PRO

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

71%

#342

Radeon X1600 Pro

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

69%

#343

RADEON X300SE

MSRP: $60|Avg: $60

66%

#345

RADEON X800 GTO

MSRP: $199|Avg: $199

60%

#346

Radeon X1600 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

60%

#347

Radeon X1300

MSRP: $100|Avg: $49

60%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 380 LP is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6300M.

Insight	Quadro FX 380 LP	Radeon HD 6300M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 380 LP remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 380 LP Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 6300M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 380 LP and Radeon HD 6300M

Quadro FX 380 LP

The Quadro FX 380 LP is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 145 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 6300M

The Radeon HD 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 144 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 380 LP scores 145 and the Radeon HD 6300M reaches 144 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 380 LP is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6300M uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6300M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6300M).

Feature	Quadro FX 380 LP	Radeon HD 6300M
G3D Mark Score	145	144
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale 3
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	240	1280+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	1.92 TFLOPS+209%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	80
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 380 LP	Radeon HD 6300M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6300M) — the Radeon HD 6300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 380 LP	Radeon HD 6300M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 380 LP draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 6300M's 186W — a 1.6% difference. The Radeon HD 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.