Quadro FX 380 LP vs Radeon HD 6300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 380 LP vs Radeon HD 6300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 380 LP vs Radeon HD 6300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 380 LP

2008

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6300M

2011

Why buy it

✅More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 380 LP is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (145 vs 144), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 380 LP is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 380 LP makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro FX 380 LP vs Radeon HD 6300M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 380 LP

The Quadro FX 380 LP is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 145 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 6300M

The Radeon HD 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 144 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 380 LP scores 145 and the Radeon HD 6300M reaches 144 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 380 LP is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6300M uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6300M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6300M).

Feature	Quadro FX 380 LP	Radeon HD 6300M
G3D Mark Score	145	144
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale 3
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	240	1280+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	1.92 TFLOPS+209%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	80
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 380 LP	Radeon HD 6300M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 380 LP and System on the Radeon HD 6300M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6300M) — the Radeon HD 6300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 380 LP	Radeon HD 6300M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 380 LP draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 6300M's 186W — a 1.6% difference. The Radeon HD 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro FX 380 LP	Radeon HD 6300M
TDP	189W	186W-2%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	0.8	0.8

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 6300M (2011 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 380 LP	Radeon HD 6300M
MSRP	$169	—
Codename	GT200B	Cayman
Release	November 11 2008	December 1 2011
Ranking	#815	#598

Search Quadro FX 380 LP on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6300M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.