GeForce 9200M GE vs Quadro FX 380 LP

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9200M GE vs Quadro FX 380 LP FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9200M GE vs Quadro FX 380 LP: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9200M GE

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $69 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Delivers 67.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Draws 16W instead of 189W, a 173W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 380 LP across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 380 LP

2008

Why buy it

✅4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
69% HIGHER MSRP
$169 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌1081.3% higher power demand at 189W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 380 LP is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (145 vs 144), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 9200M GE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 9200M GE makes the most sense to buy today. It is $69 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $169, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 67.8% (1.4 vs 0.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro FX 380 LP still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 9200M GE vs Quadro FX 380 LP Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9200M GE

The GeForce 9200M GE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 144 points.

Quadro FX 380 LP

The Quadro FX 380 LP is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 145 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9200M GE scores 144 and the Quadro FX 380 LP reaches 145 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9200M GE is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 380 LP uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 240 (Quadro FX 380 LP). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380 LP).

Feature	GeForce 9200M GE	Quadro FX 380 LP
G3D Mark Score	144	145
Architecture	Maxwell	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	256+7%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5084 TFLOPS	0.6221 TFLOPS+22%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9200M GE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 380 LP leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 9200M GE	Quadro FX 380 LP
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9200M GE and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 380 LP. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 380 LP) — the GeForce 9200M GE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 9200M GE	Quadro FX 380 LP
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9200M GE draws 16W versus the Quadro FX 380 LP's 189W — a 168.8% difference. The GeForce 9200M GE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 350W (Quadro FX 380 LP). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 9200M GE	Quadro FX 380 LP
TDP	16W-92%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	9.0+1025%	0.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9200M GE came in at $100, while the Quadro FX 380 LP launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce 9200M GE was 40.8% cheaper ($69 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 0.9 (Quadro FX 380 LP) — the GeForce 9200M GE offers 55.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9200M GE (2016 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 9200M GE	Quadro FX 380 LP
MSRP	$100-41%	$169
Performance per Dollar	1.4+56%	0.9
Codename	GM108	GT200B
Release	March 25 2016	November 11 2008
Ranking	#864	#815

Search GeForce 9200M GE on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 380 LP on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.