GeForce 9200M GE vs GeForce G210

NVIDIA

GeForce 9200M GE

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce G210

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz

GeForce 9200M GE vs GeForce G210 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9200M GE vs GeForce G210 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9200M GE vs GeForce G210: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9200M GE

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 16W instead of 30W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce G210 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 100% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 3.0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

GeForce G210

2017

Why buy it

  • 1.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 105.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 87.5% higher power demand at 30W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce G210 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (148 vs 144), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 9200M GE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce G210 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 105.6% (3.0 vs 1.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce G210 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 9200M GE has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9200M GE vs GeForce G210 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9200M GE

The GeForce 9200M GE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 144 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce G210

The GeForce G210 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9200M GE scores 144 and the GeForce G210 reaches 148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9200M GE is built on Maxwell while the GeForce G210 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 384 (GeForce G210). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G210). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 9200M GEGeForce G210
G3D Mark Score
144
148+3%
Architecture
Maxwell
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
256
384+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5084 TFLOPS
1.127 TFLOPS+122%
Boost Clock
993 MHz
1468 MHz+48%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
128 KB
144 KB+13%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 9200M GEGeForce G210
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9200M GE and 128-bit on the GeForce G210. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce G210) — the GeForce 9200M GE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 9200M GEGeForce G210
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce G210). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 9200M GEGeForce G210
DirectX
10.0
11.1 (10_1)+11%
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9200M GE) vs None (GeForce G210). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce G210).

FeatureGeForce 9200M GEGeForce G210
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
VP4
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9200M GE draws 16W versus the GeForce G210's 30W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce 9200M GE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 350W (GeForce G210). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 100.

FeatureGeForce 9200M GEGeForce G210
TDP
16W-47%
30W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75°C-25%
100
Perf/Watt
9.0+84%
4.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9200M GE came in at $100, while the GeForce G210 launched at $50. On MSRP, GeForce G210 was 50% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 3.0 (GeForce G210) — the GeForce G210 offers 114.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce G210 (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce 9200M GEGeForce G210
MSRP
$100
$50-50%
Performance per Dollar
1.4
3.0+114%
Codename
GM108
GP108
Release
March 25 2016
May 17 2017
Ranking
#864
#641

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.