GeForce 310 vs GeForce 9200M GE

NVIDIA

GeForce 310

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 9200M GE

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 310 vs GeForce 9200M GE Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 310 vs GeForce 9200M GE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 310 vs GeForce 9200M GE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 310

2015

Why buy it

  • 1.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $55 less on MSRP ($45 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 120.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($45 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 106.3% higher power demand at 33W vs 16W.

GeForce 9200M GE

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 16W instead of 33W, a 17W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 122.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$45 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $45 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 310 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 9200M GE instead at 144 vs 143, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 310 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 310 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $55 cheaper on MSRP at $45 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 120.7% (3.2 vs 1.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 310 vs GeForce 9200M GE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 310

The GeForce 310 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 143 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9200M GE

The GeForce 9200M GE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 144 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 310 scores 143 and the GeForce 9200M GE reaches 144 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 310 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 9200M GE uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 310) vs 256 (GeForce 9200M GE). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 310) vs 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200M GE). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 993 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 310GeForce 9200M GE
G3D Mark Score
143
144
Architecture
Maxwell
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384+50%
256
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7227 TFLOPS+42%
0.5084 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
941 MHz
993 MHz+6%
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
192 KB+50%
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 310GeForce 9200M GE
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 310 and 128-bit on the GeForce 9200M GE.

FeatureGeForce 310GeForce 9200M GE
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 310) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9200M GE). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce 310GeForce 9200M GE
DirectX
10.1
10.0
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 310) vs No (GeForce 9200M GE). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 310) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9200M GE).

FeatureGeForce 310GeForce 9200M GE
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
PureVideo HD VP3
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 310 draws 33W versus the GeForce 9200M GE's 16W — a 69.4% difference. The GeForce 9200M GE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 310) vs 350W (GeForce 9200M GE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce 310GeForce 9200M GE
TDP
33W
16W-52%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
168mm
0mm
Height
69mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
4.3
9.0+109%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 310 came in at $45, while the GeForce 9200M GE launched at $100. On MSRP, GeForce 310 was 55% cheaper ($55 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce 310) vs 1.4 (GeForce 9200M GE) — the GeForce 310 offers 128.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9200M GE (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 310GeForce 9200M GE
MSRP
$45-55%
$100
Performance per Dollar
3.2+129%
1.4
Codename
GM108
GM108
Release
March 13 2015
March 25 2016
Ranking
#810
#864

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.