
GeForce 310

GeForce 9200M GE
GeForce 310 vs GeForce 9200M GE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 310 vs GeForce 9200M GE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 310 vs GeForce 9200M GE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 310
2015Why buy it
- ✅1.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $55 less on MSRP ($45 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 120.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($45 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌106.3% higher power demand at 33W vs 16W.
GeForce 9200M GE
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 16W instead of 33W, a 17W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌122.2% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$45 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $45 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 310 vs GeForce 9200M GE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 310
The GeForce 310 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 143 points.

GeForce 9200M GE
The GeForce 9200M GE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 144 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 310 scores 143 and the GeForce 9200M GE reaches 144 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 310 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 9200M GE uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 310) vs 256 (GeForce 9200M GE). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 310) vs 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200M GE). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 993 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 310 | GeForce 9200M GE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 143 | 144 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+50% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS+42% | 0.5084 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 993 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+50% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 310 | GeForce 9200M GE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 310 and 128-bit on the GeForce 9200M GE.
| Feature | GeForce 310 | GeForce 9200M GE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 310) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9200M GE). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce 310 | GeForce 9200M GE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 310) vs No (GeForce 9200M GE). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 310) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9200M GE).
| Feature | GeForce 310 | GeForce 9200M GE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 310 draws 33W versus the GeForce 9200M GE's 16W — a 69.4% difference. The GeForce 9200M GE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 310) vs 350W (GeForce 9200M GE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 310 | GeForce 9200M GE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 16W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 4.3 | 9.0+109% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 310 came in at $45, while the GeForce 9200M GE launched at $100. On MSRP, GeForce 310 was 55% cheaper ($55 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce 310) vs 1.4 (GeForce 9200M GE) — the GeForce 310 offers 128.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9200M GE (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 310 | GeForce 9200M GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $45-55% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2+129% | 1.4 |
| Codename | GM108 | GM108 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | March 25 2016 |
| Ranking | #810 | #864 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














