
GeForce 310

Quadro FX 380 LP
GeForce 310 vs Quadro FX 380 LP Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 310 vs Quadro FX 380 LP FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 310 vs Quadro FX 380 LP: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 310
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $124 less on MSRP ($45 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 270.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($45 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 189W, a 156W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 380 LP across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro FX 380 LP
2008Why buy it
- ✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌275.6% HIGHER MSRP$169 MSRPvs$45 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $45 MSRP).
- ❌472.7% higher power demand at 189W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 310 vs Quadro FX 380 LP Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 310
The GeForce 310 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 143 points.

Quadro FX 380 LP
The Quadro FX 380 LP is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 145 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 310 scores 143 and the Quadro FX 380 LP reaches 145 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 310 is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 380 LP uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 310) vs 240 (Quadro FX 380 LP). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 310) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380 LP).
| Feature | GeForce 310 | Quadro FX 380 LP |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 143 | 145+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+60% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS+16% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 310 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 380 LP leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 310 | Quadro FX 380 LP |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 310 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 380 LP. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 310) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 380 LP) — the GeForce 310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 310 | Quadro FX 380 LP |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 310 draws 33W versus the Quadro FX 380 LP's 189W — a 140.5% difference. The GeForce 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 310) vs 350W (Quadro FX 380 LP). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 310 | Quadro FX 380 LP |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-83% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.3+438% | 0.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 310 came in at $45, while the Quadro FX 380 LP launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce 310 was 73.4% cheaper ($124 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce 310) vs 0.9 (Quadro FX 380 LP) — the GeForce 310 offers 255.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 310 (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 310 | Quadro FX 380 LP |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $45-73% | $169 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2+256% | 0.9 |
| Codename | GM108 | GT200B |
| Release | March 13 2015 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #810 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














