GeForce 310 vs Quadro FX 380 LP

NVIDIA

GeForce 310

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 380 LP

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 310 vs Quadro FX 380 LP Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 310 vs Quadro FX 380 LP FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 310 vs Quadro FX 380 LP: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 310

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $124 less on MSRP ($45 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • Delivers 270.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($45 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • Draws 33W instead of 189W, a 156W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 380 LP across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 380 LP

2008

Why buy it

  • 3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 275.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $169 MSRPvs$45 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $45 MSRP).
  • 472.7% higher power demand at 189W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 380 LP is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (145 vs 143), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 310 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 310 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $124 cheaper on MSRP at $45 vs $169, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 270.4% (3.2 vs 0.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro FX 380 LP still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 310 vs Quadro FX 380 LP Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 310

The GeForce 310 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 143 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 380 LP

The Quadro FX 380 LP is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 145 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 310 scores 143 and the Quadro FX 380 LP reaches 145 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 310 is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 380 LP uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 310) vs 240 (Quadro FX 380 LP). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 310) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380 LP).

FeatureGeForce 310Quadro FX 380 LP
G3D Mark Score
143
145+1%
Architecture
Maxwell
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384+60%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7227 TFLOPS+16%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
80+233%
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 310 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 380 LP leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 310Quadro FX 380 LP
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 310 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 380 LP. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 310) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 380 LP) — the GeForce 310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 310Quadro FX 380 LP
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 310 draws 33W versus the Quadro FX 380 LP's 189W — a 140.5% difference. The GeForce 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 310) vs 350W (Quadro FX 380 LP). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 310Quadro FX 380 LP
TDP
33W-83%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
4.3+438%
0.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 310 came in at $45, while the Quadro FX 380 LP launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce 310 was 73.4% cheaper ($124 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce 310) vs 0.9 (Quadro FX 380 LP) — the GeForce 310 offers 255.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 310 (2015 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 310Quadro FX 380 LP
MSRP
$45-73%
$169
Performance per Dollar
3.2+256%
0.9
Codename
GM108
GT200B
Release
March 13 2015
November 11 2008
Ranking
#810
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.