GeForce 310 vs GeForce Go 7700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 310 vs GeForce Go 7700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 310 vs GeForce Go 7700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 310

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($45 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 33W instead of 230W, a 197W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce Go 7700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce Go 7700

2013

Why buy it

✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $45 MSRP).
❌597% higher power demand at 230W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce Go 7700 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.5% in PassMark G3D (148 vs 143), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 310 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 310 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce Go 7700 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 310 vs GeForce Go 7700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 310

The GeForce 310 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 143 points.

GeForce Go 7700

The GeForce Go 7700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 310 scores 143 and the GeForce Go 7700 reaches 148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 310 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce Go 7700 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 310) vs 1,536 (GeForce Go 7700). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 310) vs 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7700). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 1085 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 310	GeForce Go 7700
G3D Mark Score	143	148+3%
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	1536+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7227 TFLOPS	3.333 TFLOPS+361%
Boost Clock	941 MHz	1085 MHz+15%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	128+433%
L1 Cache	192 KB+50%	128 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 310	GeForce Go 7700
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 310 and 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7700. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 310) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce Go 7700) — the GeForce 310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 310	GeForce Go 7700
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 310) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7700). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 310	GeForce Go 7700
DirectX	10.1+12%	9.0c
OpenGL	3.3+57%	2.1
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 310) vs No (GeForce Go 7700). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 310) vs MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7700).

Feature	GeForce 310	GeForce Go 7700
Encoder	None	No
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	PureVideo
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2	MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 310 draws 33W versus the GeForce Go 7700's 230W — a 149.8% difference. The GeForce 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 310) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7700). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce 310	GeForce Go 7700
TDP	33W-86%	230W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	168mm	0mm
Height	69mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	4.3+617%	0.6

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 310 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce 310	GeForce Go 7700
MSRP	$45	—
Codename	GM108	GK104
Release	March 13 2015	May 30 2013
Ranking	#810	#398

Search GeForce 310 on Amazon

Search GeForce Go 7700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.