GeForce 9200M GE vs Radeon R5 220
GeForce 9200M GE
Popular choices:
Radeon R5 220
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9200M GE is positioned at rank 675 and the Radeon R5 220 is on rank 252, so the Radeon R5 220 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9200M GE
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 220
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 220 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9200M GE.
| Insight | GeForce 9200M GE | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 220 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 220 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $15), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9200M GE | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9200M GE and Radeon R5 220
GeForce 9200M GE
The GeForce 9200M GE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 144 points.
Radeon R5 220
The Radeon R5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9200M GE scores 144 and the Radeon R5 220 reaches 147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9200M GE is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R5 220 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 2,560 (Radeon R5 220). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 220).
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 144 | 147+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 2560+900% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5084 TFLOPS | 4.849 TFLOPS+854% |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 24 | 160+567% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 640 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9200M GE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 220 has 1 GB. The Radeon R5 220 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 11.2 (Radeon R5 220). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.2+12% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9200M GE) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 220). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9200M GE draws 16W versus the Radeon R5 220's 275W — a 178% difference. The GeForce 9200M GE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 350W (Radeon R5 220). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 16W-94% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.0+1700% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9200M GE launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon R5 220 launched at $35 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.6 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 9.8 (Radeon R5 220) — the Radeon R5 220 offers 2.1% better value. The GeForce 9200M GE is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $35-65% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.6 | 9.8+2% |
| Codename | GM108 | Hawaii |
| Release | March 25 2016 | November 5 2013 |
| Ranking | #864 | #316 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9200M GE and Radeon R5 220
