GeForce 9200M GE vs Radeon R5 220

NVIDIA

GeForce 9200M GE

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 220

2013Core: 947 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 9200M GE vs Radeon R5 220 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9200M GE vs Radeon R5 220 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9200M GE vs Radeon R5 220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9200M GE

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 16W instead of 275W, a 259W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 220 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 185.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).

Radeon R5 220

2013

Why buy it

  • 4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $65 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 191.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1618.8% higher power demand at 275W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R5 220 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (147 vs 144), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 9200M GE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2016 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 220 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $65 cheaper on MSRP at $35 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 191.7% (4.2 vs 1.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 220 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 9200M GE has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9200M GE vs Radeon R5 220 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9200M GE

The GeForce 9200M GE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 144 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 220

The Radeon R5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9200M GE scores 144 and the Radeon R5 220 reaches 147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9200M GE is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R5 220 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 2,560 (Radeon R5 220). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 220).

FeatureGeForce 9200M GERadeon R5 220
G3D Mark Score
144
147+2%
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
256
2560+900%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5084 TFLOPS
4.849 TFLOPS+854%
ROPs
8
64+700%
TMUs
24
160+567%
L1 Cache
128 KB
640 KB+400%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9200M GE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 220 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 9200M GERadeon R5 220
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9200M GE has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 220 carries 1 GB. Radeon R5 220 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9200M GE and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 220.

FeatureGeForce 9200M GERadeon R5 220
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 11.2 (Radeon R5 220). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce 9200M GERadeon R5 220
DirectX
10.0
11.2+12%
Max Displays
1
3+200%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9200M GE) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 220). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD 3.1.

FeatureGeForce 9200M GERadeon R5 220
Encoder
No
VCE 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
UVD 3.1
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9200M GE draws 16W versus the Radeon R5 220's 275W — a 178% difference. The GeForce 9200M GE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 350W (Radeon R5 220). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce 9200M GERadeon R5 220
TDP
16W-94%
275W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
9.0+1700%
0.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9200M GE came in at $100, while the Radeon R5 220 launched at $35. On MSRP, Radeon R5 220 was 65% cheaper ($65 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 4.2 (Radeon R5 220) — the Radeon R5 220 offers 200% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9200M GE (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce 9200M GERadeon R5 220
MSRP
$100
$35-65%
Performance per Dollar
1.4
4.2+200%
Codename
GM108
Hawaii
Release
March 25 2016
November 5 2013
Ranking
#864
#316

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.