
GeForce 9200M GE

Quadro 400
GeForce 9200M GE vs Quadro 400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9200M GE vs Quadro 400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9200M GE vs Quadro 400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9200M GE
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $69 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 64.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 16W instead of 30W, a 14W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 400 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro 400
2017Why buy it
- ✅0.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌69% HIGHER MSRP$169 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 30W vs 16W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9200M GE vs Quadro 400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9200M GE
The GeForce 9200M GE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 144 points.

Quadro 400
The Quadro 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $119.99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9200M GE scores 144 and the Quadro 400 reaches 148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9200M GE is built on Maxwell while the Quadro 400 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 256 (Quadro 400). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro 400). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 1252 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 144 | 148+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5084 TFLOPS | 0.641 TFLOPS+26% |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | 1252 MHz+26% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24+50% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+33% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9200M GE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9200M GE and 64-bit on the Quadro 400. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro 400) — the GeForce 9200M GE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 10_1 (Quadro 400). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10_1 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9200M GE draws 16W versus the Quadro 400's 30W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce 9200M GE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 350W (Quadro 400). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 16W-47% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.0+84% | 4.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9200M GE came in at $100, while the Quadro 400 launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce 9200M GE was 40.8% cheaper ($69 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 0.9 (Quadro 400) — the GeForce 9200M GE offers 55.6% better value. The newer card here is Quadro 400 (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-41% | $169 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4+56% | 0.9 |
| Codename | GM108 | GP107 |
| Release | March 25 2016 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #864 | #741 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














