GeForce 9200M GE vs Mobility Radeon HD 4350

NVIDIA

GeForce 9200M GE

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4350

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 9200M GE vs Mobility Radeon HD 4350 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9200M GE vs Mobility Radeon HD 4350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9200M GE

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 16W instead of 50W, a 34W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 100% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 3.0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Mobility Radeon HD 4350

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 105.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 212.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Mobility Radeon HD 4350 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (148 vs 144), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 9200M GE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 4350 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 105.6% (3.0 vs 1.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon HD 4350 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 9200M GE has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9200M GE vs Mobility Radeon HD 4350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9200M GE

The GeForce 9200M GE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 144 points.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4350

The Mobility Radeon HD 4350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9200M GE scores 144 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4350 reaches 148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9200M GE is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 4350 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4350). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4350).

FeatureGeForce 9200M GEMobility Radeon HD 4350
G3D Mark Score
144
148+3%
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
256
800+213%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5084 TFLOPS
1.12 TFLOPS+120%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
40+67%
L1 Cache
128 KB+60%
80 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9200M GE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 4350 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 9200M GEMobility Radeon HD 4350
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9200M GE and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4350. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 4350) — the GeForce 9200M GE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 9200M GEMobility Radeon HD 4350
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9200M GE draws 16W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4350's 50W — a 103% difference. The GeForce 9200M GE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4350). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 9200M GEMobility Radeon HD 4350
TDP
16W-68%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
9.0+200%
3.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9200M GE came in at $100, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4350 launched at $50. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 4350 was 50% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 3.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 4350) — the Mobility Radeon HD 4350 offers 114.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9200M GE (2016 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce 9200M GEMobility Radeon HD 4350
MSRP
$100
$50-50%
Performance per Dollar
1.4
3.0+114%
Codename
GM108
Broadway
Release
March 25 2016
January 7 2010
Ranking
#864
#846

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.