GeForce 9200M GE vs Radeon HD 6320
GeForce 9200M GE
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 6320
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9200M GE is positioned at rank 675 and the Radeon HD 6320 is on rank 233, so the Radeon HD 6320 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9200M GE
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6320
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6320 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9200M GE.
| Insight | GeForce 9200M GE | Radeon HD 6320 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6320 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6320 holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $15), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 206.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9200M GE | Radeon HD 6320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+206.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9200M GE and Radeon HD 6320
GeForce 9200M GE
The GeForce 9200M GE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 144 points.
Radeon HD 6320
The Radeon HD 6320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9200M GE scores 144 and the Radeon HD 6320 reaches 147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9200M GE is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6320 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6320). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6320).
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Radeon HD 6320 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 144 | 147+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 1280+400% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5084 TFLOPS | 1.92 TFLOPS+278% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 320 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Radeon HD 6320 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6320) — the GeForce 9200M GE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Radeon HD 6320 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6320). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Radeon HD 6320 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.2+12% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5+36% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9200M GE) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6320). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs H.264,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6320).
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Radeon HD 6320 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9200M GE draws 16W versus the Radeon HD 6320's 186W — a 168.3% difference. The GeForce 9200M GE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6320). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Radeon HD 6320 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 16W-91% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.0+1025% | 0.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9200M GE launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon HD 6320 launched at $30 and now averages $5. The Radeon HD 6320 costs 66.7% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.6 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 29.4 (Radeon HD 6320) — the Radeon HD 6320 offers 206.3% better value. The GeForce 9200M GE is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Radeon HD 6320 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $30-70% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $5-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.6 | 29.4+206% |
| Codename | GM108 | Cayman |
| Release | March 25 2016 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #864 | #598 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9200M GE and Radeon HD 6320
