Quadro FX 380 LP
VS
Radeon HD 6320

Quadro FX 380 LP vs Radeon HD 6320

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 380 LP

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6320

2011Core: 750 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 380 LP is positioned at rank 362 and the Radeon HD 6320 is on rank 233, so the Radeon HD 6320 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 380 LP

#347
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
17178%
#362
Quadro FX 380 LP
MSRP: $169|Avg: $15
100%
#364
Quadro FX 1800
MSRP: $489|Avg: $100
94%
#365
FirePro 3D V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229
93%
#366
FirePro 3D V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80
93%
#367
Quadro 5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100
92%
#368
FirePro V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250
91%
#369
FirePro V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $20
91%
#370
FirePro 3D V8750
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500
83%
#371
FirePro 3D V7750
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
79%
#372
GRID M10-2B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80
77%
#373
Quadro FX 370
MSRP: $129|Avg: $500
76%
#374
RTXA5000-6Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
71%
#375
Quadro 6000
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150
71%
#376
GRID M6-0B
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
71%
#377
GRID M10-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
70%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6320

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1480%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1422%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1406%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1403%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1400%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1392%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1375%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1370%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1357%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1353%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1337%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1334%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1310%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1309%
#99
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
93%
#218
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1633%
#233
Radeon HD 6320
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
100%
#234
Radeon R7 M360
MSRP: $120|Avg: $30
100%
#235
Radeon R4E
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#236
Radeon HD4650
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
#237
Radeon HD 4850
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
97%
#238
Radeon R5 M240
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
97%
#239
Radeon HD 4350
MSRP: $35|Avg: $10
96%
#240
RADEON HD 6350
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
96%
#241
Radeon HD 4870
MSRP: $299|Avg: $25
95%
#244
Radeon HD 7560D
MSRP: $101|Avg: $15
91%
#246
GeForce GTS 250
MSRP: $129|Avg: $20
90%
#248
GeForce G100
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 6320 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 380 LP.

InsightQuadro FX 380 LPRadeon HD 6320
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)
Leading raw performance (+1.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 6320 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6320 holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $15), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 204.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro FX 380 LPRadeon HD 6320
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+204.1%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15)
More affordable ($5)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 380 LP and Radeon HD 6320

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 380 LP

The Quadro FX 380 LP is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 145 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon HD 6320

The Radeon HD 6320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $180.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 380 LP scores 145 and the Radeon HD 6320 reaches 147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 380 LP is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6320 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6320). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6320).

FeatureQuadro FX 380 LPRadeon HD 6320
G3D Mark Score
145
147+1%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TeraScale 3
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
240
1280+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
1.92 TFLOPS+209%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
80
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 380 LPRadeon HD 6320
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6320) — the Radeon HD 6320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 380 LPRadeon HD 6320
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 380 LP draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 6320's 186W — a 1.6% difference. The Radeon HD 6320 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6320). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro FX 380 LPRadeon HD 6320
TDP
189W
186W-2%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
0.8
0.8
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 380 LP launched at $169 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon HD 6320 launched at $30 and now averages $5. The Radeon HD 6320 costs 66.7% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.7 (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 29.4 (Radeon HD 6320) — the Radeon HD 6320 offers 203.1% better value. The Radeon HD 6320 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 380 LPRadeon HD 6320
MSRP
$169
$30-82%
Avg Price (30d)
$15
$5-67%
Performance per Dollar
9.7
29.4+203%
Codename
GT200B
Cayman
Release
November 11 2008
December 1 2011
Ranking
#815
#598