Radeon HD 6410D vs Radeon HD 8240

AMD

Radeon HD 6410D

2011Core: 830 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8240

2012Core: 1000 MHz

Radeon HD 6410D vs Radeon HD 8240 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6410D vs Radeon HD 8240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6410D vs Radeon HD 8240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6410D

2011

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8240 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 40% HIGHER MSRP
    $70 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.4 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 87.5% higher power demand at 375W vs 200W.

Radeon HD 8240

2012

Why buy it

  • 20.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $20 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
  • Delivers 45.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 3.4 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
  • Draws 200W instead of 375W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 8240 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 20.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.8% in PassMark G3D (246 vs 237), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 6410D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 8240 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $70, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 45.3% (4.9 vs 3.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8240 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 6410D has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 6410D vs Radeon HD 8240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 6410D

The Radeon HD 6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 237 points. Launch price was $699.

AMD

Radeon HD 8240

The Radeon HD 8240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 246 points. Launch price was $349.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6410D scores 237 and the Radeon HD 8240 reaches 246 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6410D is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon HD 8240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 6410D) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8240). Raw compute: 2.55 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6410D) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8240).

FeatureRadeon HD 6410DRadeon HD 8240
G3D Mark Score
237
246+4%
Architecture
TeraScale 3
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536 ×2+20%
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.55 TFLOPS ×2
2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs
32 ×2
32
TMUs
96 ×2+20%
80
L1 Cache
384 KB+20%
320 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6410DRadeon HD 8240
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6410D and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8240.

FeatureRadeon HD 6410DRadeon HD 8240
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6410D draws 375W versus the Radeon HD 8240's 200W — a 60.9% difference. The Radeon HD 8240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6410D) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8240). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon HD 6410DRadeon HD 8240
TDP
375W
200W-47%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt
0.6
1.2+100%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 6410D came in at $70, while the Radeon HD 8240 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8240 was 28.6% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.4 (Radeon HD 6410D) vs 4.9 (Radeon HD 8240) — the Radeon HD 8240 offers 44.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 8240 (2012 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon HD 6410DRadeon HD 8240
MSRP
$70
$50-29%
Performance per Dollar
3.4
4.9+44%
Codename
Antilles
Pitcairn
Release
March 8 2011
March 5 2012
Ranking
#583
#460

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.