Radeon HD 6610M
VS
GeForce GTX 280M

Radeon HD 6610M vs GeForce GTX 280M

AMD

Radeon HD 6610M

2011Core: 680 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 280M

2008Core: 602 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6610M is positioned at rank 594 and the GeForce GTX 280M is on rank 120, so the GeForce GTX 280M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6610M

#584
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
3836%
#586
3478%
#587
3469%
#591
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3154%
#592
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3133%
#594
Radeon HD 6610M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#595
GeForce 9300M G
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
100%
#596
GeForce 9800 GT
MSRP: $160|Avg: $20
99%
#598
GeForce 9100M G
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
98%
#599
Mobility Radeon X1900
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
98%
#600
Mobility Radeon HD 4330
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
98%
#601
GeForce 210
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
98%
#602
Radeon R7 M365X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#603
Mobility Radeon HD 5870
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
96%
#604
Radeon R7 M260DX
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#605
Radeon HD 8610G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
94%
#606
92%
#607
Radeon HD 4650 AGP
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
92%
#608
GeForce 9800M GS
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
92%
#609
Radeon R7 M270
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 280M

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
693%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
666%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
658%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
657%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
655%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
652%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
643%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
641%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
635%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
633%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
626%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
624%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
613%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
613%
#84
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
94%
#105
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
764%
#120
GeForce GTX 280M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#122
GeForce GTS 450
MSRP: $129|Avg: $20
99%
#123
Radeon HD 8570D
MSRP: $40|Avg: $15
99%
#125
Radeon HD 8650G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
96%
#126
GeForce GT 630
MSRP: $69|Avg: $20
95%
#128
Radeon HD 6770
MSRP: $129|Avg: $129
94%
#129
GeForce GT 440
MSRP: $79|Avg: $40
93%
#130
Radeon R7 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
93%
#133
Radeon HD 6750
MSRP: $109|Avg: $109
92%
#135
Radeon R5 240
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 280M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6610M.

InsightRadeon HD 6610MGeForce GTX 280M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%)
Leading raw performance (+1.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 280M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6610M and GeForce GTX 280M

AMD

Radeon HD 6610M

The Radeon HD 6610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 565 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 280M

The GeForce GTX 280M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 236W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 576 points. Launch price was $649.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6610M scores 565 and the GeForce GTX 280M reaches 576 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6610M is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce GTX 280M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 960 (Radeon HD 6610M) vs 240 (GeForce GTX 280M). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6610M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 280M).

FeatureRadeon HD 6610MGeForce GTX 280M
G3D Mark Score
565
576+2%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
65 nm
Shading Units
960+300%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS+110%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
48
80+67%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6610MGeForce GTX 280M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6610M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 280M has 1 GB. The GeForce GTX 280M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6610M) vs 256 KB (GeForce GTX 280M) — the Radeon HD 6610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 6610MGeForce GTX 280M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6610M draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 280M's 236W — a 103.5% difference. The Radeon HD 6610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6610M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 280M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.

FeatureRadeon HD 6610MGeForce GTX 280M
TDP
75W-68%
236W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
7.5+213%
2.4