Radeon HD 6610M vs Radeon R5 240

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6610M vs Radeon R5 240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6610M vs Radeon R5 240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6610M

2011

Why buy it

✅66.0% more average FPS across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Radeon R5 240

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6610M across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6610M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 66.0% in average FPS across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (565 vs 558), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 6610M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 240 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 240 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 6610M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 6610M vs Radeon R5 240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 6610M

The Radeon HD 6610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 565 points.

Radeon R5 240

The Radeon R5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 558 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6610M scores 565 and the Radeon R5 240 reaches 558 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6610M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R5 240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 960 (Radeon HD 6610M) vs 320 (Radeon R5 240). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6610M) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 240).

Feature	Radeon HD 6610M	Radeon R5 240
G3D Mark Score	565+1%	558
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	960+200%	320
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.306 TFLOPS+192%	0.448 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	48+140%	20
L1 Cache	192 KB+140%	80 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 6610M	Radeon R5 240
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6610M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 240 carries 2 GB. Radeon R5 240 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon HD 6610M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 240. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6610M) vs 256 KB (Radeon R5 240) — the Radeon HD 6610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 6610M	Radeon R5 240
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6610M draws 75W versus the Radeon R5 240's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R5 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6610M) vs 250W (Radeon R5 240). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.

Feature	Radeon HD 6610M	Radeon R5 240
TDP	75W	30W-60%
Recommended PSU	350W	250W-29%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	None
Length	—	168mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	7.5	18.6+148%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R5 240 (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	Radeon HD 6610M	Radeon R5 240
MSRP	—	$59
Codename	Blackcomb	Oland
Release	January 4 2011	October 8 2013
Ranking	#654	#911

Search Radeon HD 6610M on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 240 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.