Radeon HD 6610M vs Radeon R5 240
Radeon HD 6610M
Popular choices:
Radeon R5 240
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6610M is positioned at rank 594 and the Radeon R5 240 is on rank 135, so the Radeon R5 240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6610M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 240
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6610M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R5 240 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6610M | Radeon R5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 6610M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6610M and Radeon R5 240
Radeon HD 6610M
The Radeon HD 6610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 565 points.
Radeon R5 240
The Radeon R5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 558 points. Launch price was $69.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6610M scores 565 and the Radeon R5 240 reaches 558 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6610M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R5 240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 960 (Radeon HD 6610M) vs 320 (Radeon R5 240). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6610M) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 240).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6610M | Radeon R5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 565+1% | 558 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 960+200% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.306 TFLOPS+192% | 0.448 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 48+140% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+140% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6610M | Radeon R5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6610M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 240 has 2 GB. The Radeon R5 240 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6610M) vs 256 KB (Radeon R5 240) — the Radeon HD 6610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6610M | Radeon R5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6610M draws 75W versus the Radeon R5 240's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R5 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6610M) vs 250W (Radeon R5 240). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6610M | Radeon R5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 7.5 | 18.6+148% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 240 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6610M | Radeon R5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $59 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $10 |
| Codename | Blackcomb | Oland |
| Release | January 4 2011 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #654 | #911 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 6610M and Radeon R5 240
