GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon HD 6610M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon HD 6610M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon HD 6610M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 250

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6610M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌41.3% higher power demand at 106W vs 75W.

Radeon HD 6610M

2011

Why buy it

✅35.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 75W instead of 106W, a 31W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6610M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 35.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTS 250 instead at 569 vs 565, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTS 250 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTS 250 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 6610M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon HD 6610M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTS 250

The GeForce GTS 250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 569 points. Launch price was $129.

Radeon HD 6610M

The Radeon HD 6610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 565 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 250 scores 569 and the Radeon HD 6610M reaches 565 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 250 is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 6610M uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 250) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6610M). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 250) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6610M).

Feature	GeForce GTS 250	Radeon HD 6610M
G3D Mark Score	569	565
Architecture	Fermi	TeraScale 2
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	192	960+400%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6013 TFLOPS	1.306 TFLOPS+117%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	48+50%
L1 Cache	256 KB+33%	192 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTS 250 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6610M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTS 250	Radeon HD 6610M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTS 250 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6610M carries 512 MB. GeForce GTS 250 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 250 and System on the Radeon HD 6610M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTS 250) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6610M) — the Radeon HD 6610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTS 250	Radeon HD 6610M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 250 draws 106W versus the Radeon HD 6610M's 75W — a 34.3% difference. The Radeon HD 6610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTS 250) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6610M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GTS 250	Radeon HD 6610M
TDP	106W	75W-29%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	90°C	—
Perf/Watt	5.4	7.5+39%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 6610M (2011 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTS 250	Radeon HD 6610M
MSRP	$129	—
Codename	GF106	Blackcomb
Release	September 13 2010	January 4 2011
Ranking	#791	#654

Search GeForce GTS 250 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6610M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.