GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon R5 A240

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon R5 A240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon R5 A240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 250

2010

Why buy it

✅21.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
29% HIGHER MSRP
$129 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.4 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌253.3% higher power demand at 106W vs 30W.

Radeon R5 A240

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
✅Delivers 30.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.8 vs 4.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 106W, a 76W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTS 250 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTS 250 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 A240 instead at 576 vs 569, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTS 250 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 A240 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $29 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 30.6% (5.8 vs 4.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 A240 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTS 250 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon R5 A240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTS 250

The GeForce GTS 250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 569 points. Launch price was $129.

Radeon R5 A240

The Radeon R5 A240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 576 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 250 scores 569 and the Radeon R5 A240 reaches 576 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 250 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R5 A240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 250) vs 320 (Radeon R5 A240). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 250) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 A240).

Feature	GeForce GTS 250	Radeon R5 A240
G3D Mark Score	569	576+1%
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	192	320+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6013 TFLOPS+34%	0.448 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32+60%	20
L1 Cache	256 KB+220%	80 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTS 250 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 A240 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTS 250	Radeon R5 A240
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTS 250 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 A240 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTS 250 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 250 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 A240.

Feature	GeForce GTS 250	Radeon R5 A240
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 250 draws 106W versus the Radeon R5 A240's 30W — a 111.8% difference. The Radeon R5 A240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTS 250) vs 350W (Radeon R5 A240). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.

Feature	GeForce GTS 250	Radeon R5 A240
TDP	106W	30W-72%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	None
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	90°C	—
Perf/Watt	5.4	19.2+256%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTS 250 came in at $129, while the Radeon R5 A240 launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon R5 A240 was 22.5% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.4 (GeForce GTS 250) vs 5.8 (Radeon R5 A240) — the Radeon R5 A240 offers 31.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 A240 (2013 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTS 250	Radeon R5 A240
MSRP	$129	$100-22%
Performance per Dollar	4.4	5.8+32%
Codename	GF106	Oland
Release	September 13 2010	October 8 2013
Ranking	#791	#911

Search GeForce GTS 250 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 A240 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.