GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon HD 8550D Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon HD 8550D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon HD 8550D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTS 250
2010Why buy it
- β 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- β Draws 106W instead of 130W, a 24W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than Radeon HD 8550D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β158% HIGHER MSRP$129 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.4 vs 11.3 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
Radeon HD 8550D
2012Why buy it
- β 48.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Costs $79 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- β Delivers 157.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.3 vs 4.4 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β22.6% higher power demand at 130W vs 106W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon HD 8550D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTS 250
The GeForce GTS 250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 569 points. Launch price was $129.

Radeon HD 8550D
The Radeon HD 8550D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 567 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTS 250 scores 569 and the Radeon HD 8550D reaches 567 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 250 is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 8550D uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 250) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8550D). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 250) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8550D).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 8550D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 569 | 567 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 1024+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6013 TFLOPS | 1.761 TFLOPS+193% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTS 250 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8550D leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 8550D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 250 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8550D carries 512 MB. GeForce GTS 250 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 250 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8550D. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTS 250) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8550D) β the Radeon HD 8550D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 8550D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 250 draws 106W versus the Radeon HD 8550D's 130W β a 20.3% difference. The GeForce GTS 250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTS 250) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8550D). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 8550D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W-18% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 229mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 90Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 5.4+23% | 4.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTS 250 came in at $129, while the Radeon HD 8550D launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8550D was 61.2% cheaper ($79 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.4 (GeForce GTS 250) vs 11.3 (Radeon HD 8550D) β the Radeon HD 8550D offers 156.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 8550D (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 8550D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $50-61% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.4 | 11.3+157% |
| Codename | GF106 | Pitcairn |
| Release | September 13 2010 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #791 | #503 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















