
GeForce GTS 250

Radeon R7E
GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon R7E Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon R7E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon R7E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTS 250
2010Why buy it
- ✅10.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌92.7% higher power demand at 106W vs 55W.
- ❌22800% longer card at 229mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R7E
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 106W, a 51W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 229mm, a 228mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTS 250 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon R7E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTS 250
The GeForce GTS 250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 569 points. Launch price was $129.

Radeon R7E
The Radeon R7E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 20 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 565 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTS 250 scores 569 and the Radeon R7E reaches 565 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 250 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7E uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 250) vs 512 (Radeon R7E). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 250) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7E).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 569 | 565 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 512+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6013 TFLOPS | 0.8192 TFLOPS+36% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTS 250 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7E leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 250 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7E carries 512 MB. GeForce GTS 250 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 250 and 64-bit on the Radeon R7E.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 250) vs 12_0 (Radeon R7E). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12_0+8% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP5 (GeForce GTS 250) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7E). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 250 draws 106W versus the Radeon R7E's 55W — a 63.4% difference. The Radeon R7E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTS 250) vs 350W (Radeon R7E). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W | 55W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 229mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 5.4 | 10.3+91% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTS 250 came in at $129, while the Radeon R7E launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon R7E was 100+% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.4 (GeForce GTS 250) vs Infinity (Radeon R7E) — the Radeon R7E offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7E (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF106 | Cape Verde |
| Release | September 13 2010 | December 20 2013 |
| Ranking | #791 | #738 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














