GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon R7E

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 250

2010Core: 783 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7E

2013Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon R7E Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon R7E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon R7E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 250

2010

Why buy it

  • 10.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 92.7% higher power demand at 106W vs 55W.
  • 22800% longer card at 229mm vs 1mm.

Radeon R7E

2013

Why buy it

  • Draws 55W instead of 106W, a 51W reduction.
  • Measures 1mm instead of 229mm, a 228mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTS 250 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTS 250 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (569 vs 565), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTS 250 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTS 250 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon R7E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 250

The GeForce GTS 250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 569 points. Launch price was $129.

AMD

Radeon R7E

The Radeon R7E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 20 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 565 points. Launch price was $109.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 250 scores 569 and the Radeon R7E reaches 565 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 250 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7E uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 250) vs 512 (Radeon R7E). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 250) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7E).

FeatureGeForce GTS 250Radeon R7E
G3D Mark Score
569
565
Architecture
Fermi
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
192
512+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6013 TFLOPS
0.8192 TFLOPS+36%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTS 250 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7E leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTS 250Radeon R7E
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTS 250 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7E carries 512 MB. GeForce GTS 250 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 250 and 64-bit on the Radeon R7E.

FeatureGeForce GTS 250Radeon R7E
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 250) vs 12_0 (Radeon R7E). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTS 250Radeon R7E
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12_0+8%
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP5 (GeForce GTS 250) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7E). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 4.2.

FeatureGeForce GTS 250Radeon R7E
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP5
VCE 2.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 250 draws 106W versus the Radeon R7E's 55W — a 63.4% difference. The Radeon R7E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTS 250) vs 350W (Radeon R7E). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTS 250Radeon R7E
TDP
106W
55W-48%
Recommended PSU
450W
350W-22%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Length
229mm
1mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
5.4
10.3+91%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTS 250 came in at $129, while the Radeon R7E launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon R7E was 100+% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.4 (GeForce GTS 250) vs Infinity (Radeon R7E) — the Radeon R7E offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7E (2013 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTS 250Radeon R7E
MSRP
$129
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
4.4
Infinity
Codename
GF106
Cape Verde
Release
September 13 2010
December 20 2013
Ranking
#791
#738

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.