
GeForce GTS 250

Radeon R5 420
GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon R5 420 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon R5 420 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon R5 420: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTS 250
2010Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 420 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌61.3% HIGHER MSRP$129 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.4 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ❌112% higher power demand at 106W vs 50W.
Radeon R5 420
2017Why buy it
- ✅13.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 63% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 4.4 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 106W, a 56W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon R5 420 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTS 250
The GeForce GTS 250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 569 points. Launch price was $129.

Radeon R5 420
The Radeon R5 420 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 575 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTS 250 scores 569 and the Radeon R5 420 reaches 575 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 250 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R5 420 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 250) vs 384 (Radeon R5 420). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 250) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 420).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon R5 420 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 569 | 575+1% |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6013 TFLOPS | 0.9085 TFLOPS+51% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+167% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTS 250 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 420 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon R5 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 250 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 420 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTS 250 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 250 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 420. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTS 250) vs 512 KB (Radeon R5 420) — the Radeon R5 420 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon R5 420 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 250 draws 106W versus the Radeon R5 420's 50W — a 71.8% difference. The Radeon R5 420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTS 250) vs 350W (Radeon R5 420). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon R5 420 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W | 50W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 5.4 | 11.5+113% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTS 250 came in at $129, while the Radeon R5 420 launched at $80. On MSRP, Radeon R5 420 was 38% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.4 (GeForce GTS 250) vs 7.2 (Radeon R5 420) — the Radeon R5 420 offers 63.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 420 (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon R5 420 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $80-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.4 | 7.2+64% |
| Codename | GF106 | Lexa |
| Release | September 13 2010 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #791 | #773 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














