GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual
GeForce GTS 250
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTS 250 is positioned at rank 246 and the Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual is on rank 532, so the GeForce GTS 250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 250
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTS 250 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTS 250 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTS 250 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $30), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 47.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+47.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTS 250 and Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual
GeForce GTS 250
The GeForce GTS 250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 569 points. Launch price was $129.
Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual
The Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 577 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTS 250 scores 569 and the Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual reaches 577 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 250) vs 768 (Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 569 | 577+1% |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 768+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 250 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual has 512 MB. The GeForce GTS 250 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 250) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.2 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP5 (GeForce GTS 250) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 250 draws 106W versus the Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual's 50W — a 71.8% difference. The Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTS 250) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W | 50W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 5.4 | 11.5+113% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTS 250 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual launched at $150 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTS 250 costs 33.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.4 (GeForce GTS 250) vs 19.2 (Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual) — the GeForce GTS 250 offers 47.9% better value. The Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-14% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-33% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.4+48% | 19.2 |
| Codename | GF106 | — |
| Release | September 13 2010 | August 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #791 | #881 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTS 250 and Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual
