GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon RX 7600
GeForce GTS 250
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTS 250 is positioned at rank #246 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 250
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2010). The Radeon RX 7600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTS 250 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2814.1% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (8 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTS 250.
| Insight | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2814.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2814.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $250 (vs $20), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 133.1% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTS 250.
| Insight | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+133.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTS 250 and Radeon RX 7600
GeForce GTS 250
The GeForce GTS 250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 569 points. Launch price was $129.
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTS 250 scores 569 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 2814.1%. The GeForce GTS 250 is built on Fermi while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 250) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 250) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 569 | 16,581+2814% |
| Architecture | Fermi | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 2048+967% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6013 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+3517% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTS 250 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 250 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTS 250) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 8 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 250) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12.2+10% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP5 (GeForce GTS 250) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 250) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 250 draws 106W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 43.5% difference. The GeForce GTS 250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTS 250) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W-36% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-18% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 75°C-17% |
| Perf/Watt | 5.4 | 100.5+1761% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTS 250 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 and now averages $250. The GeForce GTS 250 costs 92% less ($230 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.4 (GeForce GTS 250) vs 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 133.5% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-52% | $269 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-92% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.4 | 66.3+133% |
| Codename | GF106 | Navi 33 |
| Release | September 13 2010 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #791 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTS 250 and Radeon RX 7600
