
Radeon HD 6650A vs GRID M60-0Q

Radeon HD 6650A
Popular choices:

GRID M60-0Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 6650A is positioned at rank #395 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6650A
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6650A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M60-0Q.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6650A | GRID M60-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6650A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6650A holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $500), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 910.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6650A | GRID M60-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+910.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6650A and GRID M60-0Q

Radeon HD 6650A
The Radeon HD 6650A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 836 points.

GRID M60-0Q
The GRID M60-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 827 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6650A scores 836 and the GRID M60-0Q reaches 827 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6650A is built on TeraScale 2 while the GRID M60-0Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 6650A) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-0Q). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6650A) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-0Q).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6650A | GRID M60-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 836+1% | 827 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 2048+327% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.576 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+738% |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 768 KB+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6650A | GRID M60-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 6650A) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-0Q) — the GRID M60-0Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6650A | GRID M60-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6650A draws 45W versus the GRID M60-0Q's 225W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon HD 6650A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6650A) vs 350W (GRID M60-0Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6650A | GRID M60-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-80% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 18.6+403% | 3.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6650A launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GRID M60-0Q launched at $0 and now averages $500. The Radeon HD 6650A costs 90% less ($450 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.7 (Radeon HD 6650A) vs 1.7 (GRID M60-0Q) — the Radeon HD 6650A offers 882.4% better value. The GRID M60-0Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6650A | GRID M60-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-90% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.7+882% | 1.7 |
| Codename | Onega | GM204 |
| Release | April 19 2011 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #926 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











