
Radeon HD 6650A

Radeon R7 A10-8750
Radeon HD 6650A vs Radeon R7 A10-8750 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 6650A vs Radeon R7 A10-8750 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 6650A vs Radeon R7 A10-8750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 6650A
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 144.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.4 vs 3.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 55W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A10-8750 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R7 A10-8750
2016Why buy it
- ✅9.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌150% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.4 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌22.2% higher power demand at 55W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6650A vs Radeon R7 A10-8750 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 6650A
The Radeon HD 6650A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 836 points.

Radeon R7 A10-8750
The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 856 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6650A scores 836 and the Radeon R7 A10-8750 reaches 856 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6650A is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 A10-8750 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 6650A) vs 512 (Radeon R7 A10-8750). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6650A) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-8750).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6650A | Radeon R7 A10-8750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 836 | 856+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 512+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.576 TFLOPS | 0.8192 TFLOPS+42% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 128 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6650A | Radeon R7 A10-8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6650A and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-8750.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6650A | Radeon R7 A10-8750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6650A draws 45W versus the Radeon R7 A10-8750's 55W — a 20% difference. The Radeon HD 6650A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6650A) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-8750). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6650A | Radeon R7 A10-8750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-18% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Perf/Watt | 18.6+19% | 15.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 6650A came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 A10-8750 launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6650A was 60% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.4 (Radeon HD 6650A) vs 3.4 (Radeon R7 A10-8750) — the Radeon HD 6650A offers 147.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A10-8750 (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6650A | Radeon R7 A10-8750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-60% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.4+147% | 3.4 |
| Codename | Onega | Cape Verde |
| Release | April 19 2011 | July 6 2016 |
| Ranking | #926 | #667 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














