Radeon HD 6700M
VS
GeForce 930M

Radeon HD 6700M vs GeForce 930M

AMD

Radeon HD 6700M

2011Core: 680 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 930M

2015Core: 549 MHzBoost: 549 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6700M is positioned at rank 366 and the GeForce 930M is on rank 153, so the GeForce 930M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6700M

#356
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1068%
#358
968%
#359
965%
#363
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
878%
#364
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
872%
#366
Radeon HD 6700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#367
GeForce 615
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#369
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
99%
#370
GeForce GT 730A
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
97%
#372
Radeon R7 M270DX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
95%
#373
Radeon HD 7660G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#374
Radeon HD 6670/7670
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
94%
#375
Radeon 620
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
94%
#376
Radeon R5 435
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
94%
#377
Radeon R9 M470X
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
91%
#379
Radeon R9 M380
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
90%
#381
Radeon HD 7640G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 930M

#42
Radeon RX 6600S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#43
Radeon RX 8060S
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
95%
#143
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
322%
#145
292%
#146
291%
#150
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
265%
#151
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
263%
#153
GeForce 930M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#157
GeForce 830M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#158
GeForce GT 750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
99%
#159
GeForce GT 425M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 6700M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 930M.

InsightRadeon HD 6700MGeForce 930M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 6700M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6700M and GeForce 930M

AMD

Radeon HD 6700M

The Radeon HD 6700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,017 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 930M

The GeForce 930M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6700M scores 1,017 and the GeForce 930M reaches 1,011 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6700M is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 930M uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 960 (Radeon HD 6700M) vs 384 (GeForce 930M). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6700M) vs 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 930M).

FeatureRadeon HD 6700MGeForce 930M
G3D Mark Score
1,017
1,011
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Maxwell
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
960+150%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS+210%
0.4216 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
48+100%
24
L1 Cache
192 KB
192 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6700MGeForce 930M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6700M) vs 1 MB (GeForce 930M) — the GeForce 930M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 6700MGeForce 930M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6700M draws 75W versus the GeForce 930M's 33W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 930M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6700M) vs 350W (GeForce 930M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy.

FeatureRadeon HD 6700MGeForce 930M
TDP
75W
33W-56%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Legacy
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
13.6
30.6+125%