Radeon HD 6700M vs Radeon R7 M260X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6700M vs Radeon R7 M260X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6700M vs Radeon R7 M260X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6700M

2011

Why buy it

✅76.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $139 MSRP).

Radeon R7 M260X

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6700M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6700M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 76.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (1,017 vs 1,013), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 6700M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 M260X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M260X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 6700M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 6700M vs Radeon R7 M260X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 6700M

The Radeon HD 6700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,017 points.

Radeon R7 M260X

The Radeon R7 M260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,013 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6700M scores 1,017 and the Radeon R7 M260X reaches 1,013 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6700M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 M260X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 960 (Radeon HD 6700M) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260X). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6700M) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260X).

Feature	Radeon HD 6700M	Radeon R7 M260X
G3D Mark Score	1,017	1,013
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	960+150%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.306 TFLOPS+138%	0.5491 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	48+100%	24
L1 Cache	192 KB+100%	96 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 6700M	Radeon R7 M260X
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6700M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M260X carries 4 GB. Radeon R7 M260X gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon HD 6700M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260X. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6700M) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 M260X) — the Radeon HD 6700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 6700M	Radeon R7 M260X
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6700M draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 M260X's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R7 M260X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6700M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon HD 6700M	Radeon R7 M260X
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	Mobile
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	85
Perf/Watt	13.6	13.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 M260X (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	Radeon HD 6700M	Radeon R7 M260X
MSRP	—	$139
Codename	Blackcomb	Opal
Release	January 4 2011	December 6 2015
Ranking	#654	#878

Search Radeon HD 6700M on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M260X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.