FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 6700M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 6700M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 6700M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M4150

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

Radeon HD 6700M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6700M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (1,017 vs 1,011), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro M4150 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro M4150 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 6700M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 6700M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M4150

The FirePro M4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.

Radeon HD 6700M

The Radeon HD 6700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,017 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M4150 scores 1,011 and the Radeon HD 6700M reaches 1,017 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4150 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 6700M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4150) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6700M). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro M4150) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6700M).

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon HD 6700M
G3D Mark Score	1,011	1,017
Architecture	GCN 1.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	960+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5491 TFLOPS	1.306 TFLOPS+138%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	48+100%
L1 Cache	96 KB	192 KB+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon HD 6700M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M4150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6700M carries 512 MB. FirePro M4150 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4150 and System on the Radeon HD 6700M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M4150) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6700M) — the Radeon HD 6700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon HD 6700M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M4150 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 6700M's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon HD 6700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4150) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6700M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon HD 6700M
TDP	150W	75W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	6.7	13.6+103%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is FirePro M4150 (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon HD 6700M
MSRP	$200	—
Codename	Opal	Blackcomb
Release	October 16 2013	January 4 2011
Ranking	#879	#654

Search FirePro M4150 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6700M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.