Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon 530

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro M4150

2013Core: 715 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon 530

2017Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Buy on Amazon

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon 530 Performance Spectrum

FirePro M4150
4 GB 150
1,011
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 6610M
brand logoRadeon HD 2900 XT
brand logoRadeon HD 7730M
brand logoRadeon Vega 3
brand logoRadeon HD 6970M Crossfire
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 6700S
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon 530
0.5 GB 50
1,037
+2.6%
brand logoRadeon R5 A240
brand logoRadeon HD 6630M
brand logoRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700
brand logoRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
brand logoRadeon RX 5500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 6700S
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon 530: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M4150

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

Radeon 530

2017

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon 530 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (1,037 vs 1,011), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M4150 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M4150 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon 530 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon 530 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro M4150

The FirePro M4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.

AMD

Radeon 530

The Radeon 530 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,037 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M4150 scores 1,011 and the Radeon 530 reaches 1,037 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4150 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon 530 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4150) vs 384 (Radeon 530). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro M4150) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 530).

FeatureFirePro M4150Radeon 530
G3D Mark Score
1,011
1,037+3%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5491 TFLOPS
0.7864 TFLOPS+43%
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
96 KB
96 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro M4150Radeon 530
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M4150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 530 carries 512 MB. FirePro M4150 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4150 and 64-bit on the Radeon 530. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M4150) vs 128 KB (Radeon 530) — the FirePro M4150 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro M4150Radeon 530
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4150) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon 530). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro M4150Radeon 530
DirectX
12
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+100%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4150) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon 530). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4150) vs H.264,H.265 (Decode),VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon 530).

FeatureFirePro M4150Radeon 530
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 3.0
Decoder
UVD
UVD 6.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265 (Decode),VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M4150 draws 150W versus the Radeon 530's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon 530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4150) vs 350W (Radeon 530). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.

FeatureFirePro M4150Radeon 530
TDP
150W
50W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C-7%
75
Perf/Watt
6.7
20.7+209%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M4150 came in at $200, while the Radeon 530 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon 530 was 100+% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (FirePro M4150) vs Infinity (Radeon 530) — the Radeon 530 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 530 (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureFirePro M4150Radeon 530
MSRP
$200
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
5.1
Infinity
Codename
Opal
Weston
Release
October 16 2013
April 18 2017
Ranking
#879
#873
Search FirePro M4150 on AmazonSearch Radeon 530 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.