FirePro M4150 vs Radeon 535
FirePro M4150
Popular choices:
Radeon 535
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro M4150 is positioned at rank 211 and the Radeon 535 is on rank 119, so the Radeon 535 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M4150
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 535
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 535 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro M4150 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro M4150 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro M4150 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro M4150 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $100), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 92.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro M4150 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+92.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M4150 and Radeon 535
FirePro M4150
The FirePro M4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.
Radeon 535
The Radeon 535 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M4150 scores 1,011 and the Radeon 535 reaches 1,049 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4150 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon 535 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4150) vs 512 (Radeon 535). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro M4150) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 535).
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,011 | 1,049+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5491 TFLOPS | 1.211 TFLOPS+121% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 128 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M4150 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 535 has 512 MB. The FirePro M4150 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M4150 draws 150W versus the Radeon 535's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon 535 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4150) vs 300W (Radeon 535). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 6.7 | 21.0+213% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M4150 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon 535 launched at $100 and now averages $100. The FirePro M4150 costs 50% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.2 (FirePro M4150) vs 10.5 (Radeon 535) — the FirePro M4150 offers 92.4% better value. The Radeon 535 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $100-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-50% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.2+92% | 10.5 |
| Codename | Opal | Lexa |
| Release | October 16 2013 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #879 | #668 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro M4150 and Radeon 535
