FirePro M4150 vs Radeon 535

FirePro M4150

2013Core: 715 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon 535

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon 535 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon 535: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M4150

2013

Why buy it

  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 100% HIGHER MSRP
    $200 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 10.5 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

Radeon 535

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $100 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Delivers 107.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon 535 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.8% in PassMark G3D (1,049 vs 1,011), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M4150 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 535 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 107.5% (10.5 vs 5.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon 535 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro M4150 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon 535 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro M4150

The FirePro M4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.

AMD

Radeon 535

The Radeon 535 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M4150 scores 1,011 and the Radeon 535 reaches 1,049 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4150 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon 535 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4150) vs 512 (Radeon 535). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro M4150) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 535).

FeatureFirePro M4150Radeon 535
G3D Mark Score
1,011
1,049+4%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5491 TFLOPS
1.211 TFLOPS+121%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
32+33%
L1 Cache
96 KB
128 KB+33%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro M4150Radeon 535
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M4150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 535 carries 512 MB. FirePro M4150 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4150 and 64-bit on the Radeon 535.

FeatureFirePro M4150Radeon 535
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M4150 draws 150W versus the Radeon 535's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon 535 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4150) vs 300W (Radeon 535). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureFirePro M4150Radeon 535
TDP
150W
50W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
6.7
21.0+213%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M4150 came in at $200, while the Radeon 535 launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon 535 was 50% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (FirePro M4150) vs 10.5 (Radeon 535) — the Radeon 535 offers 105.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 535 (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureFirePro M4150Radeon 535
MSRP
$200
$100-50%
Performance per Dollar
5.1
10.5+106%
Codename
Opal
Lexa
Release
October 16 2013
April 20 2017
Ranking
#879
#668

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.