FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R9 A375

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R9 A375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R9 A375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M4150

2013

Why buy it

✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
308.2% HIGHER MSRP
$200 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 20.9 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

Radeon R9 A375

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 313.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.9 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 A375 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (1,024 vs 1,011), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro M4150 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 A375 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $151 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 313.4% (20.9 vs 5.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 A375 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro M4150 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R9 A375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M4150

The FirePro M4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.

Radeon R9 A375

The Radeon R9 A375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1015 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,024 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M4150 scores 1,011 and the Radeon R9 A375 reaches 1,024 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4150 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 A375 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4150) vs 640 (Radeon R9 A375).

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon R9 A375
G3D Mark Score	1,011	1,024+1%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	40+67%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon R9 A375
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M4150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 A375 carries 512 MB. FirePro M4150 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4150 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 A375.

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon R9 A375
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4150) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 A375). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon R9 A375
DirectX	12	12_0
Max Displays	6	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4150) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 A375). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon R9 A375
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCE 2.0
Decoder	UVD	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M4150 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 A375's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon R9 A375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4150) vs 350W (Radeon R9 A375). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon R9 A375
TDP	150W	30W-80%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	0mm	1mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	6.7	34.1+409%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M4150 came in at $200, while the Radeon R9 A375 launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R9 A375 was 75.5% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (FirePro M4150) vs 20.9 (Radeon R9 A375) — the Radeon R9 A375 offers 309.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 A375 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon R9 A375
MSRP	$200	$49-76%
Performance per Dollar	5.1	20.9+310%
Codename	Opal	Venus
Release	October 16 2013	2015
Ranking	#879	#877

Search FirePro M4150 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 A375 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.