FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R9 A375

CPU

GPU

FirePro M4150

2013Core: 715 MHz

Radeon R9 A375

2015Core: 1015 MHzBoost: 925 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

FirePro M4150

150

1,011

0.0%

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

1,024

+1.3%

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

Radeon RX 7600M

Radeon RX 6700S

Radeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro M4150 is positioned at rank 211 and the Radeon R9 A375 is on rank 83, so the Radeon R9 A375 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro M4150

#91

RTX PRO 6000

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

99%

#92

RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

97%

#93

Quadro RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

97%

#196

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2920%

#211

FirePro M4150

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

100%

#212

FirePro V4900

MSRP: $200|Avg: $47

100%

#213

GRID K160Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $30

99%

#215

Quadro

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50

99%

#216

FirePro W5000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

98%

#219

FirePro W7000 Adapter

MSRP: $899|Avg: $15

96%

#220

Quadro K420

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

96%

#223

FirePro W7000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $50

95%

#224

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

MSRP: $169|Avg: $100

94%

#226

FirePro D500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 A375

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

347%

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

333%

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

330%

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

329%

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

328%

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

326%

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

322%

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

321%

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

318%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

317%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

313%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

313%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

307%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

307%

#68

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

383%

#79

Iris Xe Graphics MAX

MSRP: $55|Avg: $40

70%

#80

GeForce RTX 5090

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $2700

69%

#83

Radeon R9 A375

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

100%

#85

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

98%

#86

Radeon R5 A6-7480

MSRP: $35|Avg: $30

95%

#87

GeForce GT 710

MSRP: $35|Avg: $50

85%

#89

GeForce GT 740

MSRP: $89|Avg: $89

77%

#90

Radeon R7 A8-7680

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

76%

#92

Radeon HD 7730

MSRP: $75|Avg: $15

74%

#93

Radeon 540

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

70%

#97

Radeon R7 A8-7690K

MSRP: $80|Avg: $40

68%

#98

GeForce GT 1010

MSRP: $70|Avg: $70

66%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 A375 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro M4150 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	FirePro M4150	Radeon R9 A375
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+700%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 A375 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 A375 holds the technical lead. Priced at $49 (vs $50), it costs 2% less, resulting in a 3.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	FirePro M4150	Radeon R9 A375
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+3.4%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)	✅More affordable ($49)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro M4150 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 A375 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 A375

FirePro M4150

The FirePro M4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.

Radeon R9 A375

The Radeon R9 A375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1015 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,024 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M4150 scores 1,011 and the Radeon R9 A375 reaches 1,024 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4150 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 A375 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4150) vs 640 (Radeon R9 A375).

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon R9 A375
G3D Mark Score	1,011	1,024+1%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	40+67%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon R9 A375
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M4150 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 A375 has 512 MB. The FirePro M4150 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon R9 A375
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4150) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 A375). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon R9 A375
DirectX	12	12_0
Max Displays	6	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4150) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 A375). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon R9 A375
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCE 2.0
Decoder	UVD	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M4150 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 A375's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon R9 A375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4150) vs 350W (Radeon R9 A375). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon R9 A375
TDP	150W	30W-80%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	0mm	1mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	6.7	34.1+409%

💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro M4150 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R9 A375 launched at $49 and now averages $49. The Radeon R9 A375 costs 2% less ($1 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.2 (FirePro M4150) vs 20.9 (Radeon R9 A375) — the Radeon R9 A375 offers 3.5% better value. The Radeon R9 A375 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).