FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 7670A

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 7670A FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 7670A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M4150

2013

Why buy it

✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
100% HIGHER MSRP
$200 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 10.5 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.

Radeon HD 7670A

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 107.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 7670A is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.9% in PassMark G3D (1,050 vs 1,011), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro M4150 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2012. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 7670A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 107.7% (10.5 vs 5.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7670A is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro M4150 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 7670A Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M4150

The FirePro M4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.

Radeon HD 7670A

The Radeon HD 7670A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,050 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M4150 scores 1,011 and the Radeon HD 7670A reaches 1,050 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4150 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 7670A uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4150) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7670A). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro M4150) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7670A).

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon HD 7670A
G3D Mark Score	1,011	1,050+4%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	480+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5491 TFLOPS	0.576 TFLOPS+5%
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	96 KB+100%	48 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon HD 7670A
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M4150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7670A carries 512 MB. FirePro M4150 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4150 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7670A.

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon HD 7670A
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M4150 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 7670A's 45W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon HD 7670A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4150) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7670A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon HD 7670A
TDP	150W	45W-70%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	6.7	23.3+248%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M4150 came in at $200, while the Radeon HD 7670A launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7670A was 50% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (FirePro M4150) vs 10.5 (Radeon HD 7670A) — the Radeon HD 7670A offers 105.9% better value. The newer card here is FirePro M4150 (2013 vs 2012).

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon HD 7670A
MSRP	$200	$100-50%
Performance per Dollar	5.1	10.5+106%
Codename	Opal	Turks
Release	October 16 2013	January 5 2012
Ranking	#879	#870

Search FirePro M4150 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 7670A on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.