FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 6750

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 6750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 6750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M4150

2013

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
83.5% HIGHER MSRP
$200 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
❌74.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 86W.

Radeon HD 6750

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $91 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 89.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Draws 86W instead of 150W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6750 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.5% in PassMark G3D (1,046 vs 1,011), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro M4150 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6750 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $91 cheaper on MSRP at $109 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 89.8% (9.6 vs 5.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6750 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro M4150 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 6750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M4150

The FirePro M4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.

Radeon HD 6750

The Radeon HD 6750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,046 points. Launch price was $49.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M4150 scores 1,011 and the Radeon HD 6750 reaches 1,046 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4150 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 6750 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4150) vs 720 (Radeon HD 6750). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro M4150) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750).

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon HD 6750
G3D Mark Score	1,011	1,046+3%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	720+88%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5491 TFLOPS	1.008 TFLOPS+84%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	36+50%
L1 Cache	96 KB+33%	72 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon HD 6750
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M4150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6750 carries 1 GB. FirePro M4150 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4150 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6750.

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon HD 6750
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+300%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4150) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6750). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon HD 6750
DirectX	12+7%	11.2 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.2	N/A
OpenGL	4.6+5%	4.4
Max Displays	6+100%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4150) vs None (Radeon HD 6750). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4150) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6750).

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon HD 6750
Encoder	VCE 1.0	None
Decoder	UVD	UVD 2.2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M4150 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 6750's 86W — a 54.2% difference. The Radeon HD 6750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4150) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon HD 6750
TDP	150W	86W-43%
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	170mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75
Perf/Watt	6.7	12.2+82%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M4150 came in at $200, while the Radeon HD 6750 launched at $109. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6750 was 45.5% cheaper ($91 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (FirePro M4150) vs 9.6 (Radeon HD 6750) — the Radeon HD 6750 offers 88.2% better value. The newer card here is FirePro M4150 (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon HD 6750
MSRP	$200	$109-46%
Performance per Dollar	5.1	9.6+88%
Codename	Opal	Juniper
Release	October 16 2013	January 21 2011
Ranking	#879	#872

Search FirePro M4150 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6750 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.