
FirePro M4150
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7690M XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro M4150 is positioned at rank 211 and the Radeon HD 7690M XT is on rank 425, so the FirePro M4150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M4150
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7690M XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro M4150 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7690M XT.
| Insight | FirePro M4150 | Radeon HD 7690M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7690M XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7690M XT holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $50), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 24.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro M4150 | Radeon HD 7690M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+24.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M4150 and Radeon HD 7690M XT

FirePro M4150
The FirePro M4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.

Radeon HD 7690M XT
The Radeon HD 7690M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M4150 scores 1,011 and the Radeon HD 7690M XT reaches 1,009 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4150 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 7690M XT uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4150) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7690M XT). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro M4150) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7690M XT).
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Radeon HD 7690M XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,011 | 1,009 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 480+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5491 TFLOPS | 0.696 TFLOPS+27% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB+100% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Radeon HD 7690M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M4150 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7690M XT has 2 GB. The FirePro M4150 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Radeon HD 7690M XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4150) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 7690M XT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Radeon HD 7690M XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+7% | 11.2 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4150) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 7690M XT). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 3.
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Radeon HD 7690M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | UVD | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M4150 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 7690M XT's 25W — a 142.9% difference. The Radeon HD 7690M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4150) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7690M XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Radeon HD 7690M XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 25W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 6.7 | 40.4+503% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M4150 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon HD 7690M XT launched at $150 and now averages $40. The Radeon HD 7690M XT costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.2 (FirePro M4150) vs 25.2 (Radeon HD 7690M XT) — the Radeon HD 7690M XT offers 24.8% better value.
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Radeon HD 7690M XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $150-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $40-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.2 | 25.2+25% |
| Codename | Opal | Thames |
| Release | October 16 2013 | January 7 2013 |
| Ranking | #879 | #883 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















