FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R7 M260X

FirePro M4150

2013Core: 715 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M260X

2015Core: 620 MHzBoost: 715 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R7 M260X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R7 M260X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M4150

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 43.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $200 MSRPvs$139 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 7.3 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

Radeon R7 M260X

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $61 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Delivers 44.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.3 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 M260X is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (1,013 vs 1,011), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M4150 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 M260X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $61 cheaper on MSRP at $139 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 44.2% (7.3 vs 5.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M260X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro M4150 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R7 M260X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro M4150

The FirePro M4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 M260X

The Radeon R7 M260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,013 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M4150 scores 1,011 and the Radeon R7 M260X reaches 1,013 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4150 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M260X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4150) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260X). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro M4150) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260X).

FeatureFirePro M4150Radeon R7 M260X
G3D Mark Score
1,011
1,013
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5491 TFLOPS
0.5491 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
96 KB
96 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro M4150Radeon R7 M260X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4150 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260X.

FeatureFirePro M4150Radeon R7 M260X
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4150) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M260X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro M4150Radeon R7 M260X
DirectX
12
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.2
N/A
OpenGL
4.6+7%
4.3
Max Displays
6+200%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4150) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M260X). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4150) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon R7 M260X).

FeatureFirePro M4150Radeon R7 M260X
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD
UVD 3.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M4150 draws 150W versus the Radeon R7 M260X's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R7 M260X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4150) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.

FeatureFirePro M4150Radeon R7 M260X
TDP
150W
75W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C-18%
85
Perf/Watt
6.7
13.5+101%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M4150 came in at $200, while the Radeon R7 M260X launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon R7 M260X was 30.5% cheaper ($61 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (FirePro M4150) vs 7.3 (Radeon R7 M260X) — the Radeon R7 M260X offers 43.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M260X (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureFirePro M4150Radeon R7 M260X
MSRP
$200
$139-31%
Performance per Dollar
5.1
7.3+43%
Codename
Opal
Opal
Release
October 16 2013
December 6 2015
Ranking
#879
#878

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.