FirePro M4150 vs FirePro V4900

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M4150 vs FirePro V4900 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro M4150 vs FirePro V4900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M4150

2013

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

FirePro V4900

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro M4150 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (1,011 vs 1,009), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro M4150 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro M4150 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $200 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 0.2% (5.1 vs 5.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro M4150 vs FirePro V4900 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M4150

The FirePro M4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.

FirePro V4900

The FirePro V4900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M4150 scores 1,011 and the FirePro V4900 reaches 1,009 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4150 is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro V4900 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4150) vs 480 (FirePro V4900). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro M4150) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro V4900).

Feature	FirePro M4150	FirePro V4900
G3D Mark Score	1,011	1,009
Architecture	GCN 1.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	480+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5491 TFLOPS	0.768 TFLOPS+40%
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	96 KB+100%	48 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro M4150	FirePro V4900
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M4150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro V4900 carries 1 GB. FirePro M4150 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4150 and 64-bit on the FirePro V4900.

Feature	FirePro M4150	FirePro V4900
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+300%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4150) vs 11 (FirePro V4900). Vulkan: 1.2 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

Feature	FirePro M4150	FirePro V4900
DirectX	12+9%	11
Vulkan	1.2	None
OpenGL	4.6+5%	4.4
Max Displays	6+100%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4150) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro V4900). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4150) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V4900).

Feature	FirePro M4150	FirePro V4900
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCE 1.0
Decoder	UVD	UVD 3.1
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M4150 draws 150W versus the FirePro V4900's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The FirePro V4900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4150) vs 350W (FirePro V4900). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 163mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	FirePro M4150	FirePro V4900
TDP	150W	75W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	163mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	6.7	13.5+101%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M4150 came in at $200, while the FirePro V4900 launched at $200. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (FirePro M4150) vs 5.0 (FirePro V4900) — the FirePro M4150 offers 2% better value. The newer card here is FirePro M4150 (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	FirePro M4150	FirePro V4900
MSRP	$200	$200
Performance per Dollar	5.1+2%	5.0
Codename	Opal	Turks
Release	October 16 2013	November 1 2011
Ranking	#879	#882

Search FirePro M4150 on Amazon

Search FirePro V4900 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.