FirePro M4150 vs Intel UHD Graphics 620
FirePro M4150
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro M4150 is positioned at rank #211 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M4150
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro M4150 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro M4150 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 620 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M4150 and Intel UHD Graphics 620
FirePro M4150
The FirePro M4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.
Intel UHD Graphics 620
The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,041 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M4150 scores 1,011 and the Intel UHD Graphics 620 reaches 1,041 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4150 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 620 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4150) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro M4150) vs 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 620).
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,011 | 1,041+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm++ |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5491 TFLOPS+43% | 0.384 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8+167% | 3 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M4150 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 620 has 0 MB. The FirePro M4150 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4150) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4150) vs QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Decoder: UVD vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4150) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 620).
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | UVD | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M4150 draws 150W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 620's 15W — a 163.6% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4150) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 15W-90% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.7 | 69.4+936% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M4150 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Intel UHD Graphics 620 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.2 (FirePro M4150) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 620) — the Intel UHD Graphics 620 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro M4150 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.2 | Infinity |
| Codename | Opal | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Release | October 16 2013 | September 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #879 | #875 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro M4150 and Intel UHD Graphics 620
